Hawaii House Bill HCR77

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/14/25
• Report Pass: 3/27/25
• Refer: 3/27/25
• Report Pass: 4/3/25
• Refer: 4/4/25
• Report Pass: 4/17/25
• Engrossed: 4/21/25
• Passed: 4/25/25

Caption

Requesting The Agribusiness Development Corporation To Designate Kunia, Leilehua Plateau, And Poamoho As The Central Oahu Agricultural Corridor And Establish A List Prioritizing Potential Agricultural Infrastructure Improvement Projects Statewide That Would Provide The Most Value To The State.

Impact

Should HCR77 be enacted, it aims to facilitate a significant increase in local food production in alignment with the state's goal to double agricultural production by 2030. The resolution calls for the Agribusiness Development Corporation to prioritize infrastructure improvement projects that would offer maximum value to the state. This could lead to enhanced efficiency and safety in agricultural operations, as well as increased resilience against food supply disruptions. Furthermore, it also encourages the integration of agricultural considerations into long-term planning at both state and county levels.

Summary

HCR77 is a House Concurrent Resolution that seeks to enhance agricultural production in Hawaii by designating Kunia, Leilehua Plateau, and Poamoho as the Central Oahu Agricultural Corridor. The resolution emphasizes the need for improved agricultural infrastructure in the state, advocating for new roads and water systems that are vital for supporting diversified farming efforts. It reflects a recognition of the fragility of Hawaii's food supply, which is heavily dependent on imports, and the potential risks posed by natural disasters and global disruptions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR77 is broadly supportive from agricultural stakeholders who view the resolution as a crucial step towards boosting local food production and ensuring food security in Hawaii. Proponents argue that by designating the agricultural corridor, the state can mobilize resources and plan better for the future needs of the agricultural sector. However, there may be some concerns regarding the potential implications of prioritizing certain areas over others, which could lead to discussions about fairness and equity in resource allocation.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding HCR77 may arise during discussions about the specific prioritization of infrastructure projects. While the aim is to provide the most value to the state, differing opinions on what constitutes 'value' could lead to disagreements among stakeholders. Additionally, there may be apprehensions related to land use and zoning, as the designation of the corridor might impact current landowners and agricultural practices within the designated areas. The report requisitioned from the Agribusiness Development Corporation to outline these projects will likely be scrutinized for its recommendations and the rationale behind them.