Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB1161 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	THE SENATE S.B. NO. 1161 THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT Relating to non-compete clauses. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
2	2
3	3	THE SENATE S.B. NO. 1161
4	4	THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025
5	5	STATE OF HAWAII
6	6
7	7	THE SENATE
8	8
9	9	S.B. NO.
10	10
11	11	1161
12	12
13	13	THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025
14	14
15	15
16	16
17	17	STATE OF HAWAII
18	18
19	19
20	20
21	21
22	22
23	23
24	24
25	25
26	26
27	27
28	28
29	29
30	30
31	31	A BILL FOR AN ACT
32	32
33	33
34	34
35	35
36	36
37	37	Relating to non-compete clauses.
38	38
39	39
40	40
41	41
42	42
43	43	BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
44	44
45	45
46	46
47	47	SECTION 1. The legislature finds that in 2015, the State passed Act 158, Session Laws of Hawaii 2015, banning non-compete clauses for workers in the technology industry. A 2017 study published by the United States Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies found that as a result of this ban, job mobility and new‑hire wages in the State increased by eleven per cent and four per cent, respectively. The legislature also finds that non-compete clauses in employment contracts pose multiple disadvantages for employers and employees alike. Employees that have signed a non-compete clause are prevented from changing jobs to other employers in the same field. This hinders upward mobility, especially for low-wage earners, and subjects affected employees to poor working conditions as they are unable to advocate for or move to a better job. Potential employees may also need to seek expensive legal assistance when signing a contract with a non‑compete clause. The legislature further finds that employers who require a non-compete clause in an employment contract can be less attractive to potential employees due to the clause's limiting effect on future job prospects. Employers also incur legal expenses for enforcing non-compete clauses. The legislature also finds that prohibiting non-compete clauses can boost wages and narrow pay gaps experienced by minorities and women. Prohibiting non-compete clauses also encourages employers to focus on employee retention and satisfaction. Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to void existing non-compete clauses and prohibit future non-compete clauses for employees of restaurants and retail stores. SECTION 2. Section 480-4, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (d) to read as follows: "(d) Except as provided in subsection (c)(4), it shall be prohibited to include a [noncompete] non-compete clause or a [nonsolicit] non-solicit clause in any employment contract relating to an employee of a technology business[.], restaurant, or retail store. The clause shall be void and of no force and effect. As used in this subsection: "Information technology development" means the design, integration, deployment, or support services for software. ["Noncompete] "Non-compete clause" means a clause in an employment contract that prohibits an employee from working in a specific geographic area for a specific period of time after leaving employment with the employer. ["Nonsolicit] "Non-solicit clause" means a clause in an employment contract that prohibits an employee from soliciting employees of the employer after leaving employment with the employer. "Restaurant" has the same meaning as defined in section 321-30.3. "Software development" means the creation of coded computer instructions. "Technology business" means a trade or business that derives the majority of its gross income from the sale or license of products or services resulting from its software development or information technology development, or both. A "technology business" excludes any trade or business that is considered by standard practice as part of the broadcast industry or any telecommunications carrier, as defined in section 269-1, that holds a franchise or charter enacted or granted by the legislative or executive authority of the State or its predecessor governments." SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act, upon its approval, shall take effect retroactive to July 1, 2015. INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
48	48
49	49	SECTION 1. The legislature finds that in 2015, the State passed Act 158, Session Laws of Hawaii 2015, banning non-compete clauses for workers in the technology industry. A 2017 study published by the United States Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies found that as a result of this ban, job mobility and new‑hire wages in the State increased by eleven per cent and four per cent, respectively.
50	50
51	51	The legislature also finds that non-compete clauses in employment contracts pose multiple disadvantages for employers and employees alike. Employees that have signed a non-compete clause are prevented from changing jobs to other employers in the same field. This hinders upward mobility, especially for low-wage earners, and subjects affected employees to poor working conditions as they are unable to advocate for or move to a better job. Potential employees may also need to seek expensive legal assistance when signing a contract with a non‑compete clause.
52	52
53	53	The legislature further finds that employers who require a non-compete clause in an employment contract can be less attractive to potential employees due to the clause's limiting effect on future job prospects. Employers also incur legal expenses for enforcing non-compete clauses.
54	54
55	55	The legislature also finds that prohibiting non-compete clauses can boost wages and narrow pay gaps experienced by minorities and women. Prohibiting non-compete clauses also encourages employers to focus on employee retention and satisfaction.
56	56
57	57	Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to void existing non-compete clauses and prohibit future non-compete clauses for employees of restaurants and retail stores.
58	58
59	59	SECTION 2. Section 480-4, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (d) to read as follows:
60	60
61	61	"(d) Except as provided in subsection (c)(4), it shall be prohibited to include a [noncompete] non-compete clause or a [nonsolicit] non-solicit clause in any employment contract relating to an employee of a technology business[.], restaurant, or retail store. The clause shall be void and of no force and effect.
62	62
63	63	As used in this subsection:
64	64
65	65	"Information technology development" means the design, integration, deployment, or support services for software.
66	66
67	67	["Noncompete] "Non-compete clause" means a clause in an employment contract that prohibits an employee from working in a specific geographic area for a specific period of time after leaving employment with the employer.
68	68
69	69	["Nonsolicit] "Non-solicit clause" means a clause in an employment contract that prohibits an employee from soliciting employees of the employer after leaving employment with the employer.
70	70
71	71	"Restaurant" has the same meaning as defined in section 321-30.3.
72	72
73	73	"Software development" means the creation of coded computer instructions.
74	74
75	75	"Technology business" means a trade or business that derives the majority of its gross income from the sale or license of products or services resulting from its software development or information technology development, or both. A "technology business" excludes any trade or business that is considered by standard practice as part of the broadcast industry or any telecommunications carrier, as defined in section 269-1, that holds a franchise or charter enacted or granted by the legislative or executive authority of the State or its predecessor governments."
76	76
77	77	SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
78	78
79	79	SECTION 4. This Act, upon its approval, shall take effect retroactive to July 1, 2015.
80	80
81	81
82	82
83	83	INTRODUCED BY: _____________________________
84	84
85	85	INTRODUCED BY:
86	86
87	87	_____________________________
88	88
89	89
90	90
91	91
92	92
93	93	Report Title: Employment Covenants or Agreements; Non-Compete Clause; Labor; Employment Contracts; Non-Solicit Clause; Restaurants; Retail Description: Prohibits non-compete and non-solicit clauses in employment contracts for employees of restaurants and retail stores. Effective retroactive to 7/1/2015. The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
94	94
95	95
96	96
97	97
98	98
99	99
100	100
101	101	Report Title:
102	102
103	103	Employment Covenants or Agreements; Non-Compete Clause; Labor; Employment Contracts; Non-Solicit Clause; Restaurants; Retail
104	104
105	105
106	106
107	107	Description:
108	108
109	109	Prohibits non-compete and non-solicit clauses in employment contracts for employees of restaurants and retail stores. Effective retroactive to 7/1/2015.
110	110
111	111
112	112
113	113
114	114
115	115
116	116
117	117	The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.