Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB362

Introduced
1/15/25  

Caption

Relating To Digital Currency.

Impact

The bill aims to clarify that Chapter 489D applies to digital currency companies, effectively bringing them under the same regulatory framework that governs traditional money transmitters. By applying existing regulations to digital currency transactions, the state seeks to create a safer environment for consumers engaged in digital currency activities and mitigate the risks associated with unregulated operations. The bill also emphasizes the need for regulatory guidance, indicating that while the existing laws will be applied, there is a recognition that further refinements may be necessary to effectively regulate this sector.

Summary

Senate Bill 362 addresses the regulation of digital currency companies operating within the state of Hawaii. The bill was introduced in response to the findings of a study conducted by the Division of Financial Institutions (DFI) and the Hawaii Technology Development Corporation (HTDC). The study focused on the activities of digital currency companies, which were identified as not aligning with existing regulatory frameworks outlined in Chapter 489D of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, thus allowing these companies to operate unregulated. This situation raised significant concerns regarding consumer rights and protections.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention surrounding SB362 is the balance between fostering innovation in the digital currency space and ensuring adequate consumer protection. Supporters of the bill argue that regulation is essential to safeguard consumers from potential risks posed by unregulated digital currency activities. On the other hand, some stakeholders worry that stringent regulations may stifle innovation and deter new businesses from entering the market. The conversation around the need for regulatory measures reflects a broader debate on how best to oversee emerging technologies while promoting economic growth.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

CA AB599

Legislative Modernization Working Group.

CA AB478

Legislature: Member training.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

AK SCR13

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const:affirm Compliance

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon