Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB382

Introduced
1/15/25  
Refer
1/21/25  
Report Pass
2/10/25  
Refer
2/10/25  
Report Pass
2/28/25  
Engrossed
3/4/25  
Refer
3/6/25  

Caption

Relating To Procurement.

Impact

Should this bill be enacted, it would significantly change the operational dynamics of public procurement in Hawaii. The proposed rules would provide a more structured debriefing process, requiring procurement officers to maintain confidentiality regarding competing proposals for specified periods. This aims to protect sensitive information related to the bids and could potentially lead to a more competitive bidding environment, as it prevents immediate access to details that could benefit rivals.

Summary

Senate Bill 382 seeks to amend the Hawaii Revised Statutes concerning procurement procedures, specifically focusing on the rules surrounding the debriefing process for unsuccessful bidders. The bill stipulates that, when a procurement officer conducts a debriefing for a non-selected offeror, they must not disclose any competing offeror's detailed proposal or evaluation score. This disclosure is only allowed after any protest initiated by the non-selected offeror has been resolved and the contract assigned is formally executed.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 382 appears to be largely supportive among legislators focused on improving efficiency and confidentiality in procurement processes. Proponents argue that enhancing the debriefing protocol will protect trade secrets while ensuring fairness in the bidding procedures. Conversely, there may be concerns among some stakeholders about transparency and the potential for reduced scrutiny of procurement decisions, as limiting the information available could obscure the evaluation process.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between necessary confidentiality and the public's right to know the evaluation criteria and scores associated with procurement processes. Critics may argue that restricting information could inhibit accountability and transparency, potentially leading to perceptions of favoritism or bias in awarding contracts. The long-term impact of these changes will need careful monitoring to ensure that the procurement process remains equitable and transparent.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.