Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB597 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-THE SENATE S.B. NO. 597 THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025 H.D. 2 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE DRIVERS LICENSE REVOCATION. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
1+THE SENATE S.B. NO. 597 THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025 H.D. 1 STATE OF HAWAII A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE DRIVERS LICENSE REVOCATION. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
22
33 THE SENATE S.B. NO. 597
4-THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025 H.D. 2
4+THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025 H.D. 1
55 STATE OF HAWAII
66
77 THE SENATE
88
99 S.B. NO.
1010
1111 597
1212
1313 THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2025
1414
15-H.D. 2
15+H.D. 1
1616
1717 STATE OF HAWAII
1818
1919
2020
2121
2222
2323
2424
2525
2626
2727
2828
2929
3030
3131 A BILL FOR AN ACT
3232
3333
3434
3535
3636
3737 RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE DRIVERS LICENSE REVOCATION.
3838
3939
4040
4141
4242
4343 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII:
4444
4545
4646
47- SECTION 1. The legislature finds that extending the deadlines for the administrative driver's license revocation office to issue its initial decision, regarding whether to revoke the driver's license of an individual suspected of operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant, is in the best interests of public health, safety, and welfare. Each year, hundreds of people across Hawaii are injured and dozens are killed in motor vehicle collisions involving a driver who tests positive for drugs or alcohol. Effective law enforcement can help to deter would-be offenders from operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant, and part of that enforcement effort includes testing any breath or blood samples provided by drivers suspected of operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant. Aside from criminal cases, these test results, if obtained within the time period set by statute, may also be used by the administrative driver's license revocation office to potentially revoke the person's drivers license. The sooner the administrative driver's license revocation office can issue its initial decision regarding a potential license revocation, the sooner those individuals can be kept off the road or required to install an ignition interlock device if they wish to continue driving. The legislature acknowledges that while it is certainly important for the administrative driver's license revocation office to issue these decisions quickly, Hawaii is one of the few states that has a statutory deadline for decisions to be issued. Of those states that do have a deadline set by statute, the deadlines appear to be significantly longer than Hawaii's deadline. Oregon, for example, requires their administrative driver's license revocation office to issue decisions within thirty days from arrest, or sixty days from the time positive blood test results are received. Notably, Oregon has in-state labs that can test blood for the presence of drugs, while Hawaii does not. The legislature further finds that a 2024 nationwide survey of toxicology laboratories, conducted by The Center for Forensic Science Research & Education, found that fifty per cent of the labs reported testing for alcohol within fifteen days or less, while only fourteen per cent complete their testing in under six days. When testing for drugs other than alcohol, the timeframe varies greatly. Thirty-two per cent of labs reported testing in thirty days or less, while another thirty-two per cent complete their testing within thirty-one to sixty days. Only fourteen per cent reported testing for drugs within twenty days or less. These timeframes do not include the time needed for a specimen to be shipped to the lab, which is an additional factor for law enforcement agencies in Hawaii, especially those in the counties of Maui, Kauai, and Hawaii who need to ship all of their blood and urine specimens to Honolulu. Any specimens to be tested for drugs are then shipped from Honolulu to the continental United States. The legislature concludes that establishing more reasonable deadlines for the administrative driver's license revocation office to issue its decisions, which account for technological realities and align with national timeframes for testing specimens for drugs and alcohol, would enable the administrative driver's license revocation office to issue decisions that are based on physical evidence, resulting in more just and reliable outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this Act is to extend the written review decision deadline for the issuance of a notice of administrative revocation of a license to operate a vehicle. SECTION 2. Section 291E-37, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: "(a) The director [automatically] shall automatically review the issuance of a notice of administrative revocation and shall issue a written decision administratively revoking the license and privilege to operate a vehicle or rescinding the notice of administrative revocation. The written review decision shall be mailed to the respondent, or to the parent or guardian of the respondent if the respondent is under the age of eighteen, no later than: (1) [Eight] Fourteen days after the date the notice was issued in a case involving an alcohol related offense; or (2) [Twenty-two] Twenty-eight days after the date the notice was issued in a case involving a drug related offense." SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
47+ SECTION 1. The legislature finds that extending the deadlines for the administrative driver's license revocation office to issue its initial decision, regarding whether to revoke the driver's license of an individual suspected of operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant, is in the best interests of public health, safety, and welfare. Each year, hundreds of people across Hawaii are injured and dozens are killed in motor vehicle collisions involving a driver who tests positive for drugs or alcohol. Effective law enforcement can help to deter would-be offenders from operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant, and part of that enforcement effort includes testing any breath or blood samples provided by drivers suspected of operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant. Aside from criminal cases, these test results, if obtained within the time period set by statute, may also be referenced by the administrative driver's license revocation office, to potentially revoke the person's drivers license. The sooner the administrative driver's license revocation office can issue its initial decision regarding a potential license revocation, the sooner those individuals can be kept off the road or required to install an ignition interlock device if they wish to continue driving. The legislature acknowledges that while it is certainly important for administrative driver's license revocation office to issue these decisions quickly, Hawaii is one of the few states that has a statutory deadline for decisions to be issued. Of those states that do have a deadline set by statute, the deadlines appear to be significantly longer than Hawaii's deadline. Oregon, for example, requires their administrative driver's license revocation office to issue decisions within thirty days from arrest, or sixty days from the time positive blood test results are received. Notably, Oregon has in-state labs that can test blood for the presence of drugs, while Hawaii does not. The legislature further finds that a 2024 nationwide survey of toxicology laboratories, conducted by The Center for Forensic Science Research & Education, found that fifty per cent of the labs reported testing for alcohol within fifteen days or less, while only fourteen per cent complete their testing in under six days. When testing for drugs other than alcohol, the timeframe varies greatly, but thirty-two per cent of labs reported testing in thirty days or less, while another thirty-two per cent complete their testing within thirty-one to sixty days. Only fourteen per cent reported testing for drugs within twenty days or less. These timeframes do not include the time needed for a specimen to be shipped to the lab, which is an additional factor for law enforcement agencies in Hawaii, especially those in the counties of Maui, Kauai, and Hawaii who need to ship all of their blood and urine specimens to Honolulu, after which any specimens to be tested for drugs then to be shipped from Honolulu to the continental United States. The legislature concludes that establishing more reasonable deadlines for administrative driver's license revocation office to issue its decisions, which account for the realities of technology, and are more in-line with national timeframes to test specimens for the presence of drugs and alcohol, would allow administrative driver's license revocation office to issue more decisions that are based on physical evidence and thus more just and reliable in their outcome. Therefore, the purpose of this Act is to extend the written review decision deadline for the issuance of a notice of administrative revocation of a driver's license. SECTION 2. Section 291E-37, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: "(a) The director automatically shall review the issuance of a notice of administrative revocation and shall issue a written decision administratively revoking the license and privilege to operate a vehicle or rescinding the notice of administrative revocation. The written review decision shall be mailed to the respondent, or to the parent or guardian of the respondent if the respondent is under the age of eighteen, no later than: (1) [Eight] Fourteen days after the date the notice was issued in a case involving an alcohol related offense; or (2) [Twenty-two] Twenty-eight days after the date the notice was issued in a case involving a drug related offense." SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
4848
4949 SECTION 1. The legislature finds that extending the deadlines for the administrative driver's license revocation office to issue its initial decision, regarding whether to revoke the driver's license of an individual suspected of operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant, is in the best interests of public health, safety, and welfare.
5050
51- Each year, hundreds of people across Hawaii are injured and dozens are killed in motor vehicle collisions involving a driver who tests positive for drugs or alcohol. Effective law enforcement can help to deter would-be offenders from operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant, and part of that enforcement effort includes testing any breath or blood samples provided by drivers suspected of operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant. Aside from criminal cases, these test results, if obtained within the time period set by statute, may also be used by the administrative driver's license revocation office to potentially revoke the person's drivers license. The sooner the administrative driver's license revocation office can issue its initial decision regarding a potential license revocation, the sooner those individuals can be kept off the road or required to install an ignition interlock device if they wish to continue driving.
51+ Each year, hundreds of people across Hawaii are injured and dozens are killed in motor vehicle collisions involving a driver who tests positive for drugs or alcohol. Effective law enforcement can help to deter would-be offenders from operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant, and part of that enforcement effort includes testing any breath or blood samples provided by drivers suspected of operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant. Aside from criminal cases, these test results, if obtained within the time period set by statute, may also be referenced by the administrative driver's license revocation office, to potentially revoke the person's drivers license. The sooner the administrative driver's license revocation office can issue its initial decision regarding a potential license revocation, the sooner those individuals can be kept off the road or required to install an ignition interlock device if they wish to continue driving.
5252
53- The legislature acknowledges that while it is certainly important for the administrative driver's license revocation office to issue these decisions quickly, Hawaii is one of the few states that has a statutory deadline for decisions to be issued. Of those states that do have a deadline set by statute, the deadlines appear to be significantly longer than Hawaii's deadline. Oregon, for example, requires their administrative driver's license revocation office to issue decisions within thirty days from arrest, or sixty days from the time positive blood test results are received. Notably, Oregon has in-state labs that can test blood for the presence of drugs, while Hawaii does not.
53+ The legislature acknowledges that while it is certainly important for administrative driver's license revocation office to issue these decisions quickly, Hawaii is one of the few states that has a statutory deadline for decisions to be issued. Of those states that do have a deadline set by statute, the deadlines appear to be significantly longer than Hawaii's deadline. Oregon, for example, requires their administrative driver's license revocation office to issue decisions within thirty days from arrest, or sixty days from the time positive blood test results are received. Notably, Oregon has in-state labs that can test blood for the presence of drugs, while Hawaii does not.
5454
55- The legislature further finds that a 2024 nationwide survey of toxicology laboratories, conducted by The Center for Forensic Science Research & Education, found that fifty per cent of the labs reported testing for alcohol within fifteen days or less, while only fourteen per cent complete their testing in under six days. When testing for drugs other than alcohol, the timeframe varies greatly. Thirty-two per cent of labs reported testing in thirty days or less, while another thirty-two per cent complete their testing within thirty-one to sixty days. Only fourteen per cent reported testing for drugs within twenty days or less. These timeframes do not include the time needed for a specimen to be shipped to the lab, which is an additional factor for law enforcement agencies in Hawaii, especially those in the counties of Maui, Kauai, and Hawaii who need to ship all of their blood and urine specimens to Honolulu. Any specimens to be tested for drugs are then shipped from Honolulu to the continental United States.
55+ The legislature further finds that a 2024 nationwide survey of toxicology laboratories, conducted by The Center for Forensic Science Research & Education, found that fifty per cent of the labs reported testing for alcohol within fifteen days or less, while only fourteen per cent complete their testing in under six days. When testing for drugs other than alcohol, the timeframe varies greatly, but thirty-two per cent of labs reported testing in thirty days or less, while another thirty-two per cent complete their testing within thirty-one to sixty days. Only fourteen per cent reported testing for drugs within twenty days or less. These timeframes do not include the time needed for a specimen to be shipped to the lab, which is an additional factor for law enforcement agencies in Hawaii, especially those in the counties of Maui, Kauai, and Hawaii who need to ship all of their blood and urine specimens to Honolulu, after which any specimens to be tested for drugs then to be shipped from Honolulu to the continental United States.
5656
57- The legislature concludes that establishing more reasonable deadlines for the administrative driver's license revocation office to issue its decisions, which account for technological realities and align with national timeframes for testing specimens for drugs and alcohol, would enable the administrative driver's license revocation office to issue decisions that are based on physical evidence, resulting in more just and reliable outcomes.
57+ The legislature concludes that establishing more reasonable deadlines for administrative driver's license revocation office to issue its decisions, which account for the realities of technology, and are more in-line with national timeframes to test specimens for the presence of drugs and alcohol, would allow administrative driver's license revocation office to issue more decisions that are based on physical evidence and thus more just and reliable in their outcome.
5858
59- Therefore, the purpose of this Act is to extend the written review decision deadline for the issuance of a notice of administrative revocation of a license to operate a vehicle.
59+ Therefore, the purpose of this Act is to extend the written review decision deadline for the issuance of a notice of administrative revocation of a driver's license.
6060
6161 SECTION 2. Section 291E-37, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
6262
63- "(a) The director [automatically] shall automatically review the issuance of a notice of administrative revocation and shall issue a written decision administratively revoking the license and privilege to operate a vehicle or rescinding the notice of administrative revocation. The written review decision shall be mailed to the respondent, or to the parent or guardian of the respondent if the respondent is under the age of eighteen, no later than:
63+ "(a) The director automatically shall review the issuance of a notice of administrative revocation and shall issue a written decision administratively revoking the license and privilege to operate a vehicle or rescinding the notice of administrative revocation. The written review decision shall be mailed to the respondent, or to the parent or guardian of the respondent if the respondent is under the age of eighteen, no later than:
6464
6565 (1) [Eight] Fourteen days after the date the notice was issued in a case involving an alcohol related offense; or
6666
6767 (2) [Twenty-two] Twenty-eight days after the date the notice was issued in a case involving a drug related offense."
6868
6969 SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored.
7070
7171 SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 3000.
7272
73- Report Title: Administrative Driver's License Revocation Office; Written Notice; Decisions Description: Extends the deadline in which the Administrative Driver's License Revocation Office is required to issue a written review decision of a notice of administrative revocation of a person's license to operate a vehicle. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD2) The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
73+ Report Title: Administrative Driver's License Revocation Office; Written Notice; Decisions Description: Extends the time restriction in which the Administrative Driver's License Revocation Office is required to issue a written review decision of a notice of administrative revocation of a person's driver license. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1) The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.
7474
7575
7676
7777
7878
7979 Report Title:
8080
8181 Administrative Driver's License Revocation Office; Written Notice; Decisions
8282
8383
8484
8585 Description:
8686
87-Extends the deadline in which the Administrative Driver's License Revocation Office is required to issue a written review decision of a notice of administrative revocation of a person's license to operate a vehicle. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD2)
87+Extends the time restriction in which the Administrative Driver's License Revocation Office is required to issue a written review decision of a notice of administrative revocation of a person's driver license. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
8888
8989
9090
9191
9292
9393
9494
9595 The summary description of legislation appearing on this page is for informational purposes only and is not legislation or evidence of legislative intent.