Hawaii Senate Bill SCR4

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/25
• Refer: 2/3/25
• Report Pass: 3/12/25
• Refer: 3/12/25
• Engrossed: 3/31/25
• Refer: 4/4/25
• Report Pass: 4/14/25
• Refer: 4/14/25
• Report Pass: 4/17/25
• Passed: 4/24/25

Caption

Authorizing The Issuance Of A Twenty-five-year Term, Non-exclusive Easement Covering A Portion Of State Submerged Lands At Kikiaola, Kekaha, Kauai, For A Shoreline Protection Structure, And For Use, Repair, And Maintenance Of The Improvements Constructed Thereon.

Impact

The passage of SCR4 has the potential to greatly influence local land management practices by establishing a legal framework for the long-term use of state submerged lands for protective structures. It formalizes arrangements that allow property owners to maintain and utilize structures that might otherwise be deemed illegal encroachments. This resolution highlights the state's commitment to preserving coastal areas while balancing the rights of property owners and environmental regulations.

Summary

SCR4 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution from the Thirty-third Legislature of Hawaii seeking to authorize a twenty-five-year term non-exclusive easement for a shoreline protection structure located at Kikiaola, Kekaha, Kauai. The resolution aims to formalize the use of a structure that has been in place, which was previously authorized temporarily for shoreline stabilization. The structure was built to mitigate erosion affecting adjacent properties and ensure compliance with existing state regulations regarding submerged lands.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR4 appears to lean towards support, especially from the property owners directly impacted by the resolution, such as Graham and Marisa Chelius. The legislative discussions indicate a recognition of the necessity for such protective measures in light of ongoing erosion issues. However, there could also be some concern from environmentalists regarding the implications of long-term easements on state land, which needs to be managed carefully to avoid adverse ecological impacts.

Contention

While overall support for the bill is evident, contention may arise from individuals or organizations wary of permanent easements for structures on public land. Critics could argue that granting such easements may set a precedent for future encroachments or could detract from the preservation of natural coastlines in the area. Legislators and stakeholders might need to address these concerns to ensure the balance between development needs and environmental protection.