Iowa House Bill HF2567

Iowa 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/24

Caption

A bill for an act relating to illegal reentry into the state by certain aliens, prohibition on arrest in certain locations, orders to return to a foreign nation, immunity from liability and indemnification for enforcement actions, sentencing restrictions, and providing penalties.(Formerly HSB 703.)

Impact

One of the significant implications of HF2567 is the prohibition of arrests in certain sensitive locations such as schools, healthcare facilities, and places of worship. This provision aims to ensure that enforcement actions do not impede individuals' access to essential services and education. Additionally, the bill comprehensively outlines indemnification frameworks for local and state government officials enforcing the law, thereby shielding them from legal repercussions unless misconduct is established. This could enhance local compliance with state-led immigration enforcement initiatives, but it may also spark conversations about accountability and fairness.

Summary

House File 2567 addresses illegal reentry into the state by certain aliens and outlines specific procedures and penalties associated with this offense. It establishes that an alien commits a crime if they enter, attempt to enter, or are found in the state after being previously deported or denied admission into the United States. The severity of the offense varies based on prior convictions and circumstances surrounding their removal, potentially escalating to felony charges depending on the nature of past misdemeanors or felonies. This law emphasizes the accountability related to immigration enforcement at the state level.

Contention

Notably, the bill has generated discussion regarding potential overreach in local governance and the implications of civil liabilities for enforcement actions. Critics argue that the immunity provisions could enable infringement on individual rights without adequate recourse for affected individuals. Furthermore, stipulations against delaying prosecution based on immigration status determinations suggest a more aggressive stance on enforcement, potentially conflicting with existing federal guidelines. As such, HF2567 reflects ongoing tensions between state and federal immigration policies, raising debates about the appropriateness of local-level involvement in immigration matters.