A bill for an act relating to certain deadlines relating to the informal review and protest of property assessments in counties declared to be a disaster area or that are the subject of a disaster emergency proclamation. (Formerly HSB 94.) Effective date: 07/01/2023.
The intended impact of HF270 is to provide relief to property owners in disaster-affected counties by allowing them more opportunity to contest property assessments during a challenging time. By extending these deadlines, the bill helps ensure that community members can address potential inaccuracies in their property valuations, which may be especially relevant following significant property damages or changes in market values due to disasters. This may lead to a more equitable property tax assessment, facilitating better financial conditions for residents during recovery periods.
House File 270 (HF270) addresses the timelines related to the informal review and protest procedures for property assessments in counties that have been declared disaster areas or are under a disaster emergency proclamation. The bill amends existing laws to extend the timeframe for taxpayers to inquire about and challenge their property assessments in the wake of a disaster declaration. This extension allows property owners more time to engage in the assessment process, specifically from April 25 to May 25 for inquiries and extending the protest filing period to include up to June 5, when applicable.
The sentiment surrounding HF270 has been overwhelmingly positive, with broad support across both parties, evidenced by the unanimous vote of 95-0. This bipartisan approval indicates a general consensus on the importance of providing financial relief and support for taxpayers in disaster-stricken areas. Stakeholders view the bill as a necessary step in protecting taxpayer rights and ensuring that local governments can adjust their assessment practices in response to extraordinary circumstances.
While the bill received strong support, some concerns were raised about the implications of extended protest periods for local government operations. Critics argued that longer timelines might lead to administrative challenges for local assessors and boards of review while managing increased volumes of property assessments and protests. However, these concerns were largely outweighed by the recognition of the need to support residents impacted by disasters at such critical moments.