Iowa House Bill HF336

Iowa 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/23
• Refer: 5/4/23

Caption

A bill for an act concerning persons appointed to a convention called by the United States Congress to propose amendments to the United States Constitution, providing a penalty, and including effective date provisions.(Formerly HF 34; See HF 2311.)

Impact

The bill implements a prohibition against commissioners proposing or voting to approve any amendments or rules that fall outside of the parameters established by the state. Commissioners are required to take an oath affirming their commitment to uphold the U.S. Constitution and limit their actions to those authorized by the state. This measure is significant as it aims to prevent any deviations or introductions of amendments that are not aligned with the original joint resolution that initiated the convention, thus providing a level of control over the state's representation.

Summary

House File 336 is a legislative bill intended to establish clear guidelines and restrictions for individuals designated to represent the state at an Article V convention called by the United States Congress for the purpose of proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution. This legislation outlines the definition of an Article V convention, the roles and responsibilities of commissioners appointed to such conventions, and the types of amendments that would be considered unauthorized. By setting these parameters, the bill aims to ensure that commissioners adhere to specific mandates and instructions provided by the state assembly.

Contention

While the bill is designed to maintain order and adherence to state directives during an Article V convention, it is likely to be met with varying perspectives. Proponents may argue that the restrictions are necessary to maintain the integrity of the constitutional amendment process and to ensure that state representatives do not overreach their jurisdiction or authority. On the other hand, critics might contend that such limitations could inhibit open discourse on potential amendments that might be beneficial to the state's citizens, thus prompting concerns regarding legislative overreach and the preservation of democratic processes.