Iowa House Bill HF623

Iowa 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/23

Caption

A bill for an act relating to prohibited activities regarding gender transition procedures relative to minors, and including effective date and applicability provisions.(Formerly HSB 214.)

Impact

If enacted, HF623 would significantly impact how health care services for gender transition are administered to minors in the state. The bill prohibits certain medical treatments that have been increasingly recognized in discussions around transgender health care. Proponents argue that the legislation is necessary to protect minors from irreversible medical procedures that they may not fully understand, while opponents view it as an infringement on medical freedom and necessary health care options for transgender youth. Furthermore, the bill places liability on health care professionals who violate these prohibitions, suggesting a serious regulatory shift in how care is provided.

Summary

House File 623 is a bill that establishes prohibitions on gender transition procedures related to minors. The bill defines terms such as 'gender', 'health care professional', 'minor', and 'sex'. It specifically prohibits health care professionals from knowingly engaging in practices intended to alter or affirm a minor's perception of their gender if such practices are inconsistent with the minor's biological sex. This includes practices such as prescribing puberty blockers, administering hormones beyond normal physiological levels, and performing surgeries that sterilize or alter bodily characteristics.

Contention

The main points of contention surrounding HF623 stem from its implications for the treatment and care of transgender minors. Critics of the bill argue that it undermines the autonomy of individuals and their families to make informed decisions regarding their health care in consultation with qualified professionals. Additionally, the exceptions outlined in the bill, which allow for certain medical interventions in cases of biological disorders, may lead to debates on what constitutes an acceptable medical practice. Supporters argue that the bill safeguards children from choices that are beyond their maturity level, but detractors see it as a move that could harm vulnerable youth seeking affirmation and support in their gender identity.