A bill for an act relating to private land available for public use for recreational purposes.
SF275 could face scrutiny not just from property owners wary of liability but also from local governments concerning how the amendment impacts urban planning and land management policies.
The proposed legislation is positioned within the framework of Code chapter 461C, which generally shields landholders from liability when their private land is made available for public recreational activities without charge. By explicitly detailing how private properties can be used for recreational purposes, the bill may encourage more landowners to permit public access, thereby increasing opportunities for activities such as hiking, biking, and urban deer control.
Senate File 275, introduced by Shipley and a companion to HF 35, aims to expand the definition of private land available for public use for recreational purposes. The bill seeks to define 'bicycle' more inclusively to include any device with a saddle that is human-powered or an electric variant, regardless of wheel count. Additionally, it amends the definition of private land to encompass various land types, such as abandoned surface mines and private roadways used for recreational pathways and trails. Notably, it also includes lands not open to the general public, which could allow for more diverse recreational engagement.
PCritics of the bill may raise concerns regarding the potential implications for landowners' rights and safety regulations. While supporters argue that increasing recreational access is beneficial for public health and community engagement, questions could arise about the responsibilities of landowners in ensuring safety if they must allow access to their properties. Additionally, there may be discussions about maintaining the balance between recreational use and the private property owners' control over their land.