A bill for an act relating to public education, including participation in surveys, analyses, activities, or evaluations by students, employees, and contractors of school districts or charter schools and prohibiting the use of certain resources or materials related to social and emotional learning.
If enacted, SF85 will reshape the landscape of public education by placing strict limitations on the types of information that can be solicited from students through surveys. Specifically, it prohibits the Department of Education from using or promoting materials associated with social and emotional learning (SEL) frameworks. By disallowing the use of these materials for educational purposes, the bill alters how schools address essential topics of emotional well-being and psychological development. This change could lead to a significant reduction in resources available for teachers and administrators who aim to support students' social-emotional health.
Senate File 85, introduced by Senator Salmon, is a significant piece of legislation aimed at regulating aspects of public education within the state. The bill addresses participation in surveys, analyses, activities, or evaluations that involve students, school employees, and contractors from school districts or charter schools. It emphasizes the need for transparency and parental involvement by mandating that parents or guardians provide written consent before any student can participate in surveys that delve into sensitive topics such as political affiliations, mental health issues, and personal behaviors. This requirement aims to protect students' privacy rights and grant parents greater control over the information shared about their children.
Debate surrounding SF85 is expected to be contentious, as it touches on the balance between student privacy rights and the necessity of social-emotional education in schools. Advocates for the bill argue that parental consent is crucial for protecting children and ensuring that families remain informed about the types of evaluations conducted in schools. Conversely, critics, including educators and mental health professionals, express concern that the bill may hinder the development of comprehensive emotional learning programs, which they believe are essential for fostering students' overall well-being. The prohibition against certain educational resources may create barriers for schools trying to implement effective SEL initiatives, potentially undermining the support systems in place for students facing emotional and psychological challenges.