A bill for an act relating to conflicts between federal funding and the office of the chief information officer.(See SF 388.)
Impact
If enacted, SSB1161 would have a significant impact on how state agencies interact with federal funding protocols. By delineating that state rules only apply to procedural matters and that federal definitions govern eligibility and allocation, the bill reinforces the importance of maintaining compliance with federal law. This approach is designed to foster a clear, coordinated governance structure between federal and state levels of funding, potentially making it easier for state officials to secure necessary federal resources.
Summary
Senate Study Bill 1161 aims to clarify the relationship between state law and federal funding as it pertains to the operations of the office of the chief information officer in Iowa. The bill proposes amendments to Section 8B.7 of the Iowa Code, stipulating that the regulations and rules established by this chapter must align with federal definitions and criteria for eligibility regarding the allocation of federal funds. Essentially, it seeks to ensure that state regulations do not conflict with federal guidelines, preventing any modifications that might jeopardize the receipt of these funds.
Contention
While the bill appears primarily procedural, it may raise concerns regarding the extent of state authority over federal funds. Some stakeholders may view the limitations imposed on state regulations as a loss of local control. Additionally, the emphasis on federal definitions could complicate or slow the process of allocating funds at the state level, especially if specific state priorities are not well aligned with federal requirements. However, supporters argue that aligning state laws with federal guidelines is essential for maximizing funding opportunities.
Replaced by
A bill for an act relating to conflicts between federal funding and the office of the chief information officer. (Formerly SSB 1161.) Vetoed 6-1-23.
Transferring all information technology services under the chief information technology officer of each branch of government, creating chief information security officers within the judicial and legislative branches, requiring a chief information security officer to be appointed by the attorney general, secretary of state, state treasurer and insurance commissioner and requiring the chief information security officers to implement certain minimum cybersecurity standards, making and concerning appropriations for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2026, for the office of information technology, Kansas information security office and the adjutant general, authorizing certain transfers and imposing certain limitations and restrictions, and directing or authorizing certain disbursements and procedures for all state agencies and requiring legislative review of state agencies not in compliance with this act.