A bill for an act relating to students who attend a course in religious instruction that is provided by a private organization, including by modifying provisions related to compulsory education and chronic absenteeism. (Formerly HSB 218.) Effective date: 07/01/2025.
The legislation has implications for how absenteeism is calculated within school districts, notably excluding absences related to religious instruction from the total count of absences considered for chronic absentee status. This amendment is expected to facilitate the participation of students in religious education without penalty regarding their school attendance records. Schools are mandated to excuse these absences, thus actively promoting religious education within the existing framework of compulsory education laws.
House File 870 (HF870) is an act designed to address the attendance of students participating in religious instruction provided by private organizations. The bill modifies existing provisions related to compulsory education and chronic absenteeism, establishing clear guidelines for students who wish to be excused from school to attend such courses. It allows for up to five hours of absence per week for this purpose, provided that specific requirements are met, including providing notification to the school and maintaining attendance records by the private organization offering the religious instruction.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding HF870 appears to be positive among its supporters, who view it as a supportive measure for religious freedom and educational choice. The unanimous passage of the bill in a recent vote indicates widespread agreement on its intentions. However, there could be concerns among opponents regarding the separation of church and state, and whether public educational resources should interact with private religious instruction, although specific opposition has not been prominently noted in the discussions.
While HF870 has passed without recorded opposition, notable points of contention may arise regarding the balance of public education responsibilities and private religious instruction. Critics may argue that the legislation could lead to increased absence rates and affect student performance if not properly managed. Furthermore, questions about the implications for educational equity may emerge, particularly if private religious organizations gain undue influence over public school policies related to attendance and curriculum.