The implications of HB 0391 are relatively limited as it mainly addresses administrative details rather than substantive legal changes. By updating the short title of the Supreme Court Historic Preservation Act, the legislature aims to maintain a clear and consistent legal framework. This bill reflects the ongoing effort to keep state laws well-organized and accessible, ensuring that future references to the Act are straightforward and unambiguous.
Summary
House Bill 0391, introduced by Rep. Emanuel Chris Welch, seeks to amend the Supreme Court Historic Preservation Act. The primary focus of this bill is to implement a technical change in Section 1 of the Act, which pertains to its short title. This change does not propose any new regulations or alter the existing provisions but aims to refine language used in the original legislation. Such amendments are commonly made to enhance clarity and ensure that the legal language remains current.
Contention
During the legislative process, technical amendments like this often elicit minimal opposition, as they are seen as necessary housekeeping measures rather than controversial changes. However, it's essential to understand that there may still be discussions regarding the implications of any language used in such amendments, though it is unlikely that HB 0391 will face significant contention due to its straightforward nature.