The bill's effect on state law is primarily procedural, focusing on the language and structure used within the State Facilities Closure Act. Such amendments might appear minor but are crucial for legal precision. By streamlining how the Act is referenced, it can help facilitate easier compliance and enforcement by state agencies. Clear legislative language also benefits the public by improving transparency and understanding of the laws that govern state operations, particularly in relation to the closure of state facilities.
House Bill 0972, introduced by Representative Emanuel Chris Welch, amends the State Facilities Closure Act by making a technical change in the section concerning the short title. The specific modification involves clarifying references to the Act, ensuring that all mentions are uniform and easily identifiable. This type of technical amendment is often necessary to maintain clarity within legislative texts and can help avoid possible legal ambiguities in future interpretations of the law. While the changes are technical in nature, they contribute to the overall coherence and functionality of state laws.
Since the amendment is technical, it has not sparked significant opposition or contention in legislative discussions. However, any changes to established laws, even those of a technical nature, can prompt scrutiny to ensure that no unintended consequences arise from the modifications. Legislative members may review the implications of the language changes to ascertain that they do not alter the intended meaning or function of the Act.