Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB2491

Introduced
2/15/23  
Introduced
2/15/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Refer
2/15/23  
Refer
3/10/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Refer
3/10/23  

Caption

FIN-COLLECTION/TRANSACTION FEE

Impact

The implications of HB2491 on state law include a clearer definition of the permissible practices surrounding transaction fees charged by collection agencies. By outlining conditions under which a debtor can choose to pay a transaction fee, the legislation shifts the focus toward protecting debtor interests and improving oversight of collection practices. This reform is important as it seeks to facilitate a more equitable debt collection process by providing clearer guidelines that agencies must follow, thereby reducing potential exploitative actions.

Summary

House Bill 2491 amends the Collection Agency Act in Illinois, specifically addressing provisions related to disciplinary actions by the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation. A notable change introduced by this bill is the establishment of guidelines allowing debtors to make payments that include transaction fees, provided that these payments meet specified conditions. This amendment aims to enhance the transparency and fairness within debt collection practices while ensuring that debtors are informed of their payment options. The bill is set to affect the way collection agencies interact with debtors, particularly regarding fee structures.

Contention

While the bill presents several positive aspects regarding enhanced debtor rights, there are points of contention regarding how these transaction fees might be leveraged in practice. Critics may argue that allowing transaction fees could lead to additional financial burdens on debtors if not adequately regulated. Concerns might arise that collection agencies could manipulate fee structures to maximize profits, which could counteract the intended protections for consumers. Therefore, the balance between regulation and business operations in the collection industry remains a critical focus for ongoing discussions related to this bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB618

Transactions and use taxes: City of Scotts Valley: City of Emeryville.

CA AB3259

Transactions and use taxes: City of Campbell: City of Pinole: County of Solano.

CA SB319

Criminal justice statistics: reporting.

CA AB2598

Crimes: money laundering.

CA SB703

Transactions and use taxes: Counties of Alameda and Santa Clara and City of Santa Fe Springs.

CA AB2443

Transactions and use taxes: Cities of Lancaster, Palmdale, and Victorville.

CA SB152

Transactions and use taxes: County of Sonoma.

CA SB335

Transactions and use taxes: County of Santa Clara.