Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB2622

Introduced
2/15/23  
Introduced
2/15/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Refer
2/15/23  
Report Pass
3/7/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Engrossed
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/7/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Engrossed
3/22/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Chaptered
6/30/23  
Chaptered
6/30/23  

Caption

DOWNSTATE FOREST PRESERVE-FUND

Impact

The approval of HB2622 has significant implications for environmental management in Illinois. By ensuring that forest preserve districts have dedicated resources to address the long-term impacts of landfills, the bill supports enhanced preventive and corrective actions. This legislative measure aims to streamline funding related to landfill operation and decrease the burden on local governments, enabling them to more effectively manage environmental risks and protect public health.

Summary

House Bill 2622 aims to establish a 'Landfill Expense Fund' for downstate forest preserve districts in Illinois. This fund is designed to cover costs associated with the operation and closure of sanitary landfills and pollution control facilities. The bill outlines specific expenses that the fund can address, including maintenance, monitoring, and remedial actions necessary to prevent pollution and protect public health. The fund can be sustained for up to 40 years after the facility's closure and also allows for certain charges to be levied to accumulate funds.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears overwhelmingly positive, particularly as it received a unanimous vote without any opposition. Legislators and stakeholders recognize the necessity of having a financial mechanism in place to manage landfill-related expenses and ensure environmental safety. The broad support reflects a collective agreement on the importance of environmental stewardship and local governance in maintaining public health standards.

Contention

While the bill is widely supported, it also raises some salient points of contention regarding the balance of funding responsibility and local government autonomy. Critics may argue that imposing charges on landfill users could affect operational costs and the competitiveness of local businesses. Additionally, there may be discussions on how effectively the established fund can be managed over time to meet evolving environmental challenges. However, these points of contention were notably absent in discussions surrounding the bill's passage, highlighting a focus on consensus building among legislators.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.