The impact of HB2749 on state law is relatively minimal in terms of policy implications. By making technical changes, the bill seeks to ensure that the Historic Preservation Act is more comprehensible and accessible. However, such amendments can have significant implications for legal interpretations and practical applications of the law, making it essential for stakeholders to have clear and consistent language in statutory texts.
Summary
House Bill 2749 is an amendment to the Historic Preservation Act, as introduced by Representative Daniel Didech during the 103rd General Assembly in Illinois. The bill primarily aims to make technical changes to the existing language pertaining to the short title of the Act. This type of amendment suggests a focus on clarity and precision in legal terms without making substantive alterations to existing policies or provisions related to historic preservation in the state.
Contention
As of the current session, there appear to be no notable points of contention regarding HB2749, given its nature as a technical amendment. Typically, bills that focus on stylistic or technical adjustments do not provoke significant debate, but they are crucial for maintaining the integrity of the legal framework. Discussions may arise in the appropriate committees, primarily related to procedural aspects rather than ideological differences or substantial policy shifts.