Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB3514

Introduced
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/17/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Refer
3/10/23  
Refer
2/28/23  

Caption

OPEN MEETINGS-REMOTE MEETINGS

Impact

If enacted, HB3514 would significantly affect the operations of various public bodies in Illinois, particularly during times when remote meetings have become more prevalent due to health crises or emergencies. Supporters of the bill assert that it will enhance transparency and accountability by ensuring that decision-making processes occur in person, thereby fostering an environment where all members can engage face-to-face. However, this requirement could also limit the ability to convene meetings during emergencies or for members who cannot attend for valid reasons.

Summary

House Bill 3514, introduced by Rep. Dan Caulkins, seeks to amend the Open Meetings Act in Illinois, specifically targeting the manner in which public bodies may conduct closed meetings. The bill proposes that a public body should not conduct closed meetings via audio or video conference, mandating that such meetings occur only where a quorum of the members is physically present. This amendment intends to reinforce physical attendance and participation in governmental meetings.

Contention

There are potential points of contention surrounding HB3514, particularly in the context of modern governance and the changing landscape of public meetings. Opponents may argue that requiring physical presence for all closed meetings could hinder inclusivity and access, especially for individuals with disabilities, those living in remote areas, or members coping with emergencies. Additionally, critics could express concerns about the practical implications for public bodies that operate across large jurisdictions, where gathering a majority physically could pose logistical challenges.

Conforming changes

Moreover, the bill specifies that public bodies can allow participation by other means (like audio or video conferencing) in certain cases, such as when a member is unable to attend due to illness or emergencies. However, these provisions must still adhere to procedural rules established by each public body, which could lead to variability in how public access is managed across different bodies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.