Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB3852

Introduced
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/17/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Refer
3/27/23  

Caption

MINIMUM WAGE-LIFEGUARDS

Impact

If enacted, HB3852 would specifically adjust Section 4 of the Minimum Wage Law, which currently provides a lower wage threshold for employees based on their age and occupation. By mandating a minimum wage of $22.50 for all lifeguards, the bill would create a precedent within the state’s labor laws that emphasizes the value of lifeguard services. This change is particularly significant as it could stimulate interest in the profession and potentially improve overall safety at recreational facilities over the summer months.

Summary

House Bill 3852, introduced by Rep. Cyril Nichols during the 103rd General Assembly of Illinois, seeks to amend the state's Minimum Wage Law to establish a minimum wage of $22.50 per hour for individuals employed in lifeguard positions, irrespective of their age. This proposal stems from a recognized shortage of lifeguards within the state, aiming to enhance recruitment and retention in this critical public safety role. The intent is to attract a higher quality of candidates by ensuring compensation reflects the importance of their work in community safety.

Conclusion

In summary, House Bill 3852 represents a proactive approach to addressing workforce shortages in a vital public safety sector by ensuring that lifeguards are compensated at a level that reflects the importance and responsibility of their roles. The bill's passage could not only enhance recruitment efforts but also set a standard that may influence wages in other related public service sectors.

Contention

One notable point of contention regarding HB3852 may revolve around the economic implications of raising the minimum wage for lifeguards, particularly concerning how it affects smaller local governments and private entities that operate pools and beaches. Opponents might argue that imposing such a wage mandate could strain budgets and lead to reduced hiring or increased fees for public recreational services. However, supporters would likely counter that a competitive wage is necessary to ensure adequate lifeguard staffing and to prevent tragic accidents in aquatic environments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.