Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB4148

Introduced
9/26/23  
Refer
10/18/23  
Introduced
9/26/23  
Refer
10/18/23  
Report Pass
10/24/23  
Refer
10/18/23  
Engrossed
10/25/23  
Report Pass
10/24/23  
Refer
10/26/23  
Engrossed
10/25/23  

Caption

LEGISLATIVE LABOR RELATIONS

Impact

The enactment of HB 4148 will have significant implications for labor relations in state government. It reinforces employees' rights to organize and bargain collectively, ensuring that labor organizations recognized as exclusive representatives have the appropriate access to bargaining unit employees for effective representation. It's intended to establish a clear process for dispute resolution and complaint handling regarding labor practices, thereby fostering a more structured environment for legislative employee labor relations. Additionally, the legislation aims to supersede any conflicting existing laws, thereby centralizing authority and ensuring compliance with the new statutory framework.

Summary

House Bill 4148, also known as the Legislative Employee Labor Relations Act, establishes a framework for regulating labor relations between the General Assembly and legislative employees. The bill grants legislative employees the right to self-organize, choose representatives, and engage in collective bargaining over wages, hours, and conditions of employment. Moreover, it delineates the responsibilities of the Office of State Legislative Labor Relations and outlines the procedures for payroll deductions for labor organization dues, ensuring continuity even during periods of leave for employees. This aims to streamline labor management while sustaining employee representation in negotiations.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding HB 4148 reveal a mixed yet generally supportive sentiment among legislative representatives who view the bill as a necessary modernization of labor relations within the legislature. Supporters argue that it will enhance employee rights and promote a more engaged workforce, which is vital for transparent governance. Conversely, opponents express concerns that certain provisions may lead to conflicts over existing agreements or could be seen as limiting the General Assembly's authority to manage its operations effectively.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the specifics around payroll deductions and the limitations placed on how these can be altered or revoked. Some legislators fear that the provisions may disadvantage certain employees or create administrative complications. Furthermore, there is apprehension regarding the balance of power between legislative employees and the General Assembly, particularly concerning the right to strike and other collective action rights stipulated in the bill. This has sparked debates about the potential long-term effects on legislative processes and the operational efficiency of the General Assembly.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

DC PR25-0385

Collective Bargaining Agreement between the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1403, Compensation Unit 34, and the Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia Approval Resolution of 2023

MN SF3428

Technical and policy changes to certain public employee labor relations provisions

DC PR25-0306

Compensation and Working Conditions Agreement between the Office of the State Superintendent of Education and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, District Council 20, Local 1959, AFL-CIO Approval Resolution of 2023

AZ SB1684

Public employees; collective bargaining

AZ SB1670

Public employees; collective bargaining

AZ SB1553

Public employees; collective bargaining

WV HB3124

Permit collective bargaining for public employees

NJ S290

"Responsible Collective Negotiations Act."