Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB4447

Introduced
1/12/24  
Refer
1/16/24  
Introduced
1/12/24  
Refer
2/14/24  
Refer
1/16/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Refer
2/14/24  
Engrossed
4/19/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Refer
4/30/24  
Engrossed
4/19/24  
Refer
5/7/24  
Refer
4/30/24  
Report Pass
5/15/24  
Refer
5/7/24  
Enrolled
5/25/24  
Report Pass
5/15/24  
Enrolled
5/25/24  
Chaptered
8/9/24  
Chaptered
8/9/24  

Caption

INFO PROTECTION-REGISTRATION

Impact

The enactment of HB 4447 will have several implications for business law in Illinois, particularly for motor vehicle dealers. It empowers these dealers to take legal action against any unauthorized use of their intellectual property, providing a framework for enforcing their rights. The legislation not only protects the dealers themselves but also helps to maintain consumer trust by ensuring that representations of automotive businesses are accurate and legitimate. The potential for financial recovery through damages may deter misuse of dealer identities.

Summary

House Bill 4447, known as the Motor Vehicle Dealer Protection Act, aims to safeguard the identities and intellectual property of motor vehicle dealers in Illinois. The bill prohibits any third party from using the name, image, likeness, or trademark of a motor vehicle dealer without obtaining written consent from the dealer. By establishing these protections, the bill seeks to prevent unauthorized use that could mislead consumers or harm the reputation of motor vehicle dealers.

Sentiment

General sentiment around the bill appears to be positive, particularly among motor vehicle dealers and their advocates, who appreciate the enhanced protections afforded to their businesses. Supporters argue that by solidifying the rights of dealers over their likenesses and trademarks, the bill will contribute to a more ethical business environment and protect consumers from deceptive practices. However, since this bill primarily addresses the needs of a specific industry, it may not resonate with broader business interests that could overlap or conflict with these provisions.

Contention

While the bill enjoys general support, there may be some contention regarding enforcement aspects and the definitions of intellectual property involved. Critics could argue about the potential for abuse of the enforcement mechanisms, wherein dealers might target harmless uses of their trademarks or likenesses. Additionally, the delineation of what constitutes a proper request for permission may become a point of legal ambiguity, as well as the impact of such legal protections on innovation and competition within the automotive sector.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.