Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB4629

Introduced
1/30/24  
Refer
1/31/24  
Introduced
1/30/24  
Refer
2/28/24  
Refer
1/31/24  
Report Pass
3/12/24  
Refer
2/28/24  
Engrossed
4/18/24  
Report Pass
3/12/24  
Refer
4/19/24  
Engrossed
4/18/24  
Refer
4/30/24  
Refer
4/19/24  
Report Pass
5/15/24  
Refer
4/30/24  

Caption

CONSUMER FRAUD-FEE DISCLOSURE

Impact

If enacted, HB 4629 will significantly impact state laws by redefining how retailers and service providers communicate pricing to consumers. It enforces clearer visibility into the total cost, which will help protect consumers from unexpected charges. Furthermore, the bill empowers the Attorney General to enforce compliance as a violation under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, thereby increasing the accountability of businesses in their pricing practices. This could lead to changes in how businesses set prices and communicate additional fees, fostering a more transparent marketplace that values consumer rights.

Summary

House Bill 4629, also known as the Junk Fee Ban Act, establishes regulations aimed at enhancing transparency in pricing for consumers. The bill mandates that retail and food service establishments provide clear disclosures about the total price for goods and services prior to a purchase. This includes the requirement to display any additional fees, taxes, or charges that may not be immediately evident in the advertised price, ensuring that consumers can make informed choices without being misled by hidden costs. The intent behind the legislation is to combat deceptive pricing practices and promote fairness in business transactions.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 4629 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step toward consumer protection and transparency, especially in an era where hidden fees can significantly impact purchasing decisions. They emphasize the importance of ethical business practices and the rights of consumers to know exactly what they are paying for. Conversely, some opponents suggest that the additional regulations could impose burdens on businesses, particularly small enterprises that may struggle with compliance costs. The debate reflects a broader discussion about the balance between consumer protection and the operational flexibility of businesses.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about the bill's potential impact on pricing strategies for retailers and food service establishments. Critics argue that the stringent disclosure requirements may lead to increased operational costs, which could be passed on to consumers. Additionally, there are fears that the bill might inadvertently limit promotional pricing strategies that are common in retail and food services, as businesses may become overly cautious in their pricing displays. The bill's limitations on exemptions for certain types of purchases, like those made at wholesale clubs, have also raised discussions about fairness and applicability across different selling platforms.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ S1262

Prohibits retail mercantile establishments from requiring certain consumer identification for return of merchandise.

NJ S402

Prohibits retail mercantile establishments from requiring certain consumer identification for return of merchandise.

IL SB1872

PLASTIC BAG REDUCTION ACT

NJ A1264

Establishes crime of gang shoplifting.

NJ A4736

Establishes crime of gang shoplifting.

NJ S3048

Establishes crime of gang shoplifting.

NJ S582

Establishes crime of gang shoplifting.

NJ A654

Requires certain retailers to train employees on gift card fraud.