Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB5247

Introduced
2/8/24  
Refer
2/9/24  
Introduced
2/8/24  
Refer
3/5/24  
Refer
2/9/24  
Report Pass
4/3/24  
Refer
3/5/24  
Engrossed
4/19/24  
Report Pass
4/3/24  
Refer
4/30/24  
Engrossed
4/19/24  
Refer
4/30/24  
Refer
4/30/24  
Report Pass
5/8/24  
Report Pass
5/8/24  
Enrolled
5/16/24  
Enrolled
5/16/24  
Chaptered
7/19/24  
Chaptered
7/19/24  

Caption

QUICK-TAKE-CITY OF ELMHURST

Impact

If passed, HB 5247 would significantly streamline the process for the City of Elmhurst to acquire land for public use. Quick-take provisions expedite the acquisition process, which can often be a lengthy and contentious undertaking. This would lead to faster project implementation and may alleviate some logistical challenges associated with typical eminent domain proceedings. However, the bill's temporary nature suggests a targeted approach to a specific need rather than a broad reform of eminent domain practices across the state.

Summary

House Bill 5247 introduces amendments to the Eminent Domain Act, specifically allowing the City of Elmhurst to utilize quick-take proceedings for property acquisition needed for road construction. This provision is effective for a limited period of two years following its enactment. The bill details the specific property involved, including dimensions and ownership, aimed at facilitating infrastructure improvements within the city, particularly along North York Road.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5247 appears to be largely supportive among local government officials and infrastructure advocates who view the ability to expedite property acquisition as beneficial for community development. However, there may be concerns from property owners and advocates of fair compensation practices who worry about the potential for abuse of the quick-take process, viewing it as a possible infringement on property rights.

Contention

Notably, there are key points of contention regarding the quick-take mechanism itself. Critics often argue that such provisions can diminish the rights of property owners by allowing the government to acquire property with minimal compensation justification or negotiation. Proponents, on the other hand, maintain that expediting public projects is crucial for community growth and safety, making the occasional trade-off of property rights justifiable for the greater public good.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.