Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB5266

Introduced
2/8/24  
Refer
2/9/24  
Introduced
2/8/24  
Refer
2/28/24  
Refer
2/9/24  
Report Pass
3/22/24  
Refer
2/28/24  
Engrossed
4/19/24  
Report Pass
3/22/24  
Refer
5/2/24  
Engrossed
4/19/24  

Caption

PEN CD-CHI POLICE-DISABILITY

Impact

The passage of HB 5266 would significantly affect the administration of disability benefits within the Illinois Pension Code, particularly for law enforcement officers. This legal presumption of disability means that once a policeman has been denied reinstatement, they automatically qualify for benefits, easing financial hardship during periods of incapacity. This act not only reinforces protections for police officers but also sets a precedent in how disability is perceived and handled in similar cases within public service sectors.

Summary

House Bill 5266, known as the PEN CD-CHI POLICE-DISABILITY, amends the Illinois Pension Code by establishing a presumption of disability for policemen who have been denied reinstatement due to physical or mental incapacity. Under this bill, if a policeman meets the requirements for disability benefits but is denied due to not being reinstated or not being offered a limited-duty position, they are entitled to receive those benefits. This change aims to provide clearer protection and support for policemen facing disabilities who are unable to return to their previous roles.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5266 appears to be generally positive among supporters who advocate for the rights and welfare of law enforcement personnel. Advocates argue that the bill is necessary to protect officers who may be left without support after being unable to return to work due to legitimate mental or physical issues. However, there may still be concerns from critics regarding the implementation of such mandates, and how they may impact state budgets or the pension systems' sustainability over time.

Contention

One notable point of contention regarding HB 5266 could arise from state fiscal considerations. The amendment includes provisions that state no reimbursement is required from the state for implementing the mandates created by this bill. This aspect raises questions about the long-term impact on state finances since there might be an increase in claims for disability benefits. Additionally, discussions could focus on the necessary balance between providing necessary support for officers and ensuring the sustainability of the pension system as a whole.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.