Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB5479

Introduced
2/9/24  
Introduced
2/9/24  
Refer
3/12/24  
Refer
2/9/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Refer
3/12/24  
Engrossed
4/17/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Refer
4/18/24  
Engrossed
4/17/24  
Refer
4/24/24  
Refer
4/18/24  

Caption

PROGRESSIVE DESIGN-BUILD ACT

Impact

The passage of HB5479 will have significant implications for the procurement process of public projects in Illinois. By promoting the progressive design-build method, the state aims to simplify procurement and enhance project outcomes through early collaboration between designers and builders. This could lead to improved efficiency and innovation in the delivery of public infrastructure projects. Furthermore, the bill mandates adherence to goals for minority and women-owned business participation, ensuring that these entities can play a crucial role in the construction process.

Summary

HB5479, also known as the Progressive Design-Build Pilot Program Act, establishes a framework for utilizing the progressive design-build delivery method in state construction projects. This approach allows both design and construction services to be procured from a single entity, facilitating a more collaborative process. The bill authorizes the State construction agency to initiate up to three public projects employing this method, provided it is deemed beneficial for each specific project. The intent of the legislation is to enhance efficiency, potentially resulting in material savings in time or costs compared to traditional methods.

Sentiment

The consensus among supporters of HB5479 is that it presents a modern approach to public project delivery which could solve many inefficiencies associated with traditional procurement methods. Advocates argue that the bill will create opportunities for minority and women-owned businesses while improving project efficiency. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential risks associated with concentrating project control in fewer hands and whether this approach will adequately safeguard against conflicts of interest and ensure accountability in public spending.

Contention

Notably, opposition arguments often focus on the potential for reduced transparency and competition in the procurement process as it centralizes control within the selected design-build entity. Critics fear that this might lead to less favorable conditions for smaller contractors who may find it harder to compete against larger firms with more resources. Addressing these concerns will be critical as Illinois implements this pilot program, and it will be essential to monitor the outcomes of projects to gauge the effectiveness of the progressive design-build method compared to traditional approaches.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

IL SB3772

PROGRESSIVE DESIGN-BUILD ACT

AZ SB1099

Progressive design-build; ADOT

IL HB5511

PROCUREMENT-BID PREFERENCE

IL HB3551

PROCUREMENT CD-SINGLE PRIME

IL SB0215

PROGRESSIVE DESIGN-BUILD

CA SB991

Public contracts: progressive design-build: local agencies.

CA SB146

Public resources: infrastructure: contracting.

CA SB706

Public contracts: progressive design-build: local agencies.