Illinois Senate Bill SB0089

Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/20/23
• Refer: 1/20/23
• Refer: 1/31/23
• Report Pass: 2/8/23
• Engrossed: 3/23/23
• Refer: 3/24/23
• Refer: 5/16/23
• Report Pass: 5/17/23
• Enrolled: 5/24/23
• Chaptered: 5/31/23
• Passed: 5/31/23

Caption

INS CD-IIGF/CYBERSECURITY

Impact

The adoption of the Illinois Stretch Energy Code by municipalities would transform how local governments manage energy regulations for new constructions and renovations, potentially leading to increased energy savings and sustainability efforts. It enables municipalities to surpass state-mandated energy requirements, fostering a culture of innovation in energy efficiency at the local level. The provided timeline for municipalities to adopt this code includes deadlines for specific performance standards to be met by 2024 and beyond.

Summary

SB0089, known as the Illinois Stretch Energy Code bill, is designed to enhance energy efficiency in buildings across Illinois by allowing municipalities to adopt stricter energy codes than the existing Illinois Energy Conservation Code. The bill establishes standards for residential and commercial buildings, mandating performance targets based on the 2006 International Energy Conservation Code with specific site energy index reductions outlined for future years leading up to 2031.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB0089 appears to be supportive among proponents who view it as a significant step toward combating climate change through enhanced energy efficiency. However, there are concerns regarding the cost implications for local governments and how these regulations may impact builders and developers. Opponents might argue about potential local governmental overreach in enforcing stringent local building codes without sufficient statewide guidance.

Contention

Key points of contention may arise from differing opinions on the appropriateness of state-level versus local control in energy regulation. Some stakeholders might fear that stringent energy codes could pose financial burdens on builders and homeowners, while proponents believe such regulations are necessary for long-term sustainability. The balance between fostering energy efficiency and ensuring economic feasibility remains a critical area of debate as discussions surrounding SB0089 progress.