The impact of SB1077 is relatively limited, as it focuses primarily on technical adjustments rather than substantive changes to the law's enforcement or application. By ensuring that legislative text remains accurate, it helps prevent potential misunderstandings or misapplications of the law in future legal proceedings surrounding seizure and forfeiture actions.
Summary
SB1077, introduced by Senator John F. Curran, amends the Seizure and Forfeiture Reporting Act. The bill addresses technical changes to the Act, specifically in the section concerning its short title. The aim of the amendment is to ensure that the terminology used within the law is accurate and reflects current practices. Such amendments are generally categorized as housekeeping measures to improve clarity and help maintain the consistency of statutes.
Contention
Given the nature of the amendments as technical rather than substantive, there do not appear to be significant points of contention surrounding SB1077. Typically, technical amendments are less likely to attract controversy compared to more comprehensive legislative changes. However, the passage of such bills highlights the ongoing maintenance required to keep state laws up-to-date and relevant.