While the changes proposed by SB1198 may seem minor, they can have implications on the overall clarity and administration of the Department of Innovation and Technology. By refining the language of the law, state officials may find it easier to implement policies and regulations under this act. Furthermore, maintaining up-to-date and clear legislative language helps prevent potential legal disputes that can arise from ambiguities in terminology.
Summary
SB1198 aims to amend the Department of Innovation and Technology Act by making a technical change to the section concerning its short title. This bill, introduced by Senator John F. Curran, does not propose significant alterations to the substance of the existing law but rather focuses on clarifying the language. Such technical amendments are common in legislative processes to ensure precise terminology and avoid confusion in legal texts, allowing for better governance and understanding of the law.
Contention
The discussion surrounding technical amendments like those in SB1198 typically lacks significant contention, as they primarily aim to enhance the functionality of existing laws without altering their core intent. However, such amendments may still face scrutiny during the legislative process, particularly regarding their necessity and the implications of redefining legal language. Lawmakers must weigh the benefits of clarity against concerns about legislative workload and the appropriateness of dedicating resources to such changes.