Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois Senate Bill SB1889

Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
2/9/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Report Pass
3/9/23  
Engrossed
3/30/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Enrolled
5/9/23  
Chaptered
6/30/23  

Caption

PHARM-DISPENSE PRESCRIPTION

Impact

The implications of SB1889 are notable for both pharmacies and the healthcare system at large. By regulating the working hours and conditions for pharmacists and pharmacy technicians, the bill aims to promote better workplace conditions that could help retain skilled professionals in the field. Moreover, it establishes clearer career pathways for students aspiring to join the pharmacy profession, as those in pharmacy education programs will have distinct roles and responsibilities while undergoing training. This adds to the professionalism of the pharmacy practice and could potentially improve service delivery in the sector.

Summary

SB1889 aims to amend the Pharmacy Practice Act, focusing on the licensure of pharmacy technicians and student pharmacists, and their working conditions. A key feature of the bill is the establishment of regulations that govern the working hours of pharmacists, limiting them to a maximum of 12 continuous hours per day. Additionally, pharmacists working over six hours are entitled to specific break times, thereby seeking to mitigate workplace stress and enhance working conditions within pharmacies. This legislation is a significant step towards ensuring both efficient operations in pharmacies and safeguarding the well-being of pharmacy staff.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB1889 appears to be supportive, particularly among pharmacy professionals and organizations advocating for improved working conditions in healthcare settings. The provisions for mandatory breaks and regulated working hours resonate well with advocates for worker rights. However, concerns have been raised about the practical implications of enforced working hours on pharmacy operations, especially in times of high demand. Some stakeholders may argue that while these measures are well-intentioned, they could lead to operational challenges for pharmacies already facing workforce shortages.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between ensuring adequate patient care and the well-being of pharmacy staff. Critics may express concerns that enforcing strict working hours could limit pharmacies' operational flexibility, potentially impacting patient access to medications during peak times. Moreover, the requirement for student pharmacists and pharmacy technicians to fulfill certain obligations while training might also prompt discussions on the adequacy of support and resources for these individuals during their educational journey as they transition into full pharmacy roles.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB401

Pharmacy: remote dispensing site pharmacy: telepharmacy: shared clinic office space.

CA AB1286

Pharmacy.

CA SB617

Pharmacy technicians: supervision.

VA HB1067

Pharmacy technicians; expansion of allowable duties.

AZ SB1569

Pharmacy technician trainees; pharmacists; compounding