DENIAL OF PRETRIAL RELEASE
The bill notably changes the criteria for denying pretrial release. A court may now deny pretrial release if a defendant is charged with a felony and there is a belief that their release poses a 'real and present threat' to public safety. This amendment expands the circumstances under which defendants could be detained prior to trial, reflecting a growing concern about community safety and the implications of pretrial releases on crime rates. The standard established requires courts to consider specific, articulable facts related to the individual's situation when making such determinations.
SB3390, introduced by Senator John F. Curran, seeks to amend several provisions of the Criminal Code of 2012 and the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 regarding pretrial release and the conditions under which it can be denied. A significant change included in this bill is the deletion of the provision that previously prevented a person from being arrested for resisting arrest unless there was an underlying offense. This shift indicates a stricter approach towards handling situations where individuals resist law enforcement actions, potentially leading to more arrests in such instances.
Supporters argue that these changes will enhance public safety by ensuring that individuals who pose a potential threat to the community are not released pending trial. By allowing for more flexible and responsive detention criteria, the bill aims to mitigate risks associated with pretrial releases. However, critics of SB3390 warn that these provisions may infringe on defendants' rights and exacerbate issues of mass incarceration, particularly for individuals unable to secure bail or those who have not been convicted of their charges.
The bill also modifies the rules around electronic monitoring, allowing defendants on home confinement with electronic monitoring more freedom to leave their residences for essential activities with prior approval. This adjustment addresses humans' need for basic life functions while imposing oversight to maintain accountability and compliance with court-imposed conditions. Overall, SB3390 represents a shift towards a stricter legal framework designed to balance individual rights with community safety concerns.