The amendments proposed by SB3502 may not have substantial implications on existing policies or regulations since it deals primarily with a technical change rather than altering substantive provisions of the law. However, such technical changes can facilitate a clearer understanding of the Act and may aid in better implementation by agencies and the public who reference it. Maintaining clarity in laws ensures that all stakeholders operate under the same understanding of legal requirements.
Summary
SB3502, introduced by Senator Laura Ellman, seeks to amend the Environmental Protection Act by making a technical change in a section concerning its short title. The bill appears to aim at updating the language for clarity or accuracy, although the specific nature of the change is not detailed in the provided text. It reflects the state's ongoing efforts to refine legislative language, which is an essential practice for maintaining the coherence and relevance of the law as times and contexts change.
Contention
While the current text does not suggest any significant points of contention, technical amendments occasionally draw scrutiny from stakeholders who may benefit from or oppose the changes. In this instance, given that the bill pertains to a procedural adjustment rather than a policy shift, it is likely to garner less controversial discussion compared to bills that propose more significant regulatory changes or develop new mandates.