Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois Senate Bill SB3765

Introduced
2/9/24  
Refer
2/9/24  
Refer
2/28/24  

Caption

DIGITAL ASSET KIOSKS

Impact

If enacted, SB3765 will have significant implications for operators of digital asset kiosks within Illinois. The bill will not only impose a cap on daily transactions to mitigate potential risks associated with excessive trading, but it also entails new fees for operators, including an annual registration fee. Additionally, operators will be mandated to maintain accurate records of customer transactions, providing receipts that detail transaction information, which is expected to align with the consumer protection standards outlined in the Digital Assets Regulation Act. This could lead to a more regulated market for digital assets, enhancing the confidence of consumers.

Summary

Senate Bill 3765 aims to amend the Digital Assets Regulation Act by introducing regulations specific to digital asset kiosks. The bill prohibits an operator from accepting or dispensing more than $1,000 in a single day from or to a customer through a digital asset kiosk. Furthermore, it establishes requirements for customer disclosures, including details regarding transaction fees and the nature of the digital assets involved. The intention behind these regulations is to enhance transparency and consumer protection in digital asset transactions, thereby promoting a safer environment for users engaging with digital assets via kiosks.

Contention

There may be notable points of contention regarding SB3765, particularly concerning the balance between regulation and market freedom. Supporters of the bill may argue that these measures are essential to safeguard consumers from potential fraud and volatility associated with digital asset transactions. Conversely, critics could express concerns that imposing strict limits and regulations might stifle innovation in the burgeoning field of digital assets, restricting the growth potential of this industry. Furthermore, the financial implications for kiosk operators due to the additional registration fees could also lead to increased costs for consumers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB618

Transactions and use taxes: City of Scotts Valley: City of Emeryville.

CA AB3259

Transactions and use taxes: City of Campbell: City of Pinole: County of Solano.

CA AB2598

Crimes: money laundering.

CA SB319

Criminal justice statistics: reporting.

CA SB703

Transactions and use taxes: Counties of Alameda and Santa Clara and City of Santa Fe Springs.

CA AB2443

Transactions and use taxes: Cities of Lancaster, Palmdale, and Victorville.

CA SB152

Transactions and use taxes: County of Sonoma.

CA SB335

Transactions and use taxes: County of Santa Clara.