Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB1441

Introduced
1/17/25  
Refer
1/28/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Report Pass
3/18/25  
Engrossed
4/10/25  

Caption

CHICAGO LIFEGUARD AGE MINIMUM

Impact

If enacted, HB1441 will directly affect employment practices within the Chicago Park District, particularly concerning staffing policies for beach lifeguards. By raising the minimum age to 19, the bill aims to align lifeguard qualifications with safety requirements that expect a higher level of maturity and judgment in emergency situations. As a result, this could lead to fewer youth employment opportunities in these roles, potentially impacting summer job availability for younger individuals.

Summary

House Bill 1441 seeks to amend the Chicago Park District Act by establishing a minimum age requirement for lifeguards operating at beaches along the Chicago lakefront. Specifically, the bill stipulates that no individual under the age of 19 may be employed as a lifeguard in this area. This legislative move is positioned within a broader effort to enhance safety standards and ensure that lifeguards are sufficiently mature and capable of handling the responsibilities associated with the role.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1441 appears to lean toward safety and proper staffing, with supporters advocating for the bill as a necessary measure to protect beachgoers. Proponents argue that experienced and mature lifeguards are essential for ensuring public safety. However, there may also be concerns from opponents regarding youth employment opportunities and the potential negative economic impact on young job seekers who look to lifeguarding as a summer job.

Contention

While the intention behind HB1441 is to enhance safety, discussions around the bill may bring up points of contention regarding workforce limitations for the youth in Chicago. Critics could argue that the bill restricts access to valuable early job experiences for high school students or young adults, thus sparking a debate about balancing safety standards against the need for youth employment. This contention highlights the complexities involved in legislating employment practices amidst varying community interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.