Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB2516

Introduced
2/3/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Refer
3/4/25  
Report Pass
3/11/25  
Engrossed
4/10/25  

Caption

PFAS PRODUCT BAN

Impact

If enacted, HB2516 would amend existing laws to prohibit the distribution of specific products containing PFAS. The implications of this legislation are significant, as it would identify and enforce compliance regarding the use of these substances, which have been linked to environmental pollution and various health issues. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency would oversee the implementation and enforcement of this Act, ensuring violators face civil penalties that would contribute to the Environmental Protection Trust Fund, enhancing the state's ability to monitor and address environmental concerns.

Summary

House Bill 2516 aims to enhance environmental protection by banning the sale of products containing intentionally added perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in Illinois. This bill specifically focuses on various consumer products, including cookware, cosmetics, dental floss, juvenile products, menstrual products, intimate apparel, and food packaging, with a scheduled implementation date of January 1, 2032. The legislation is part of a broader effort to reduce the prevalence of these harmful substances in everyday items that may pose risks to public health and the environment.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment towards HB2516 appears to be positive among environmental advocacy groups and health specialists who advocate for reducing hazardous materials in consumer products. Proponents argue that this bill is a necessary step towards protecting public health and the environment. However, some industry representatives express concerns about the potential economic burden on manufacturers and the challenges associated with transitioning to PFAS-free alternatives, leading to a mixed reaction in certain business sectors and among legislators.

Contention

Notable points of contention surround the balance between consumer safety and the economic implications for manufacturers. Critics of the ban fear that it could lead to increased manufacturing costs and potentially limited product availability, particularly in categories like cookware and cosmetics. Furthermore, questions have arisen about the practicality of enforcement and whether alternative materials can adequately replace PFAS in these products without compromising performance or safety.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.