1 | | - | HB2966 EngrossedLRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b HB2966 Engrossed LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
2 | | - | HB2966 Engrossed LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
| 1 | + | 104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026 HB2966 Introduced , by Rep. Tracy Katz Muhl SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED: 105 ILCS 5/2-3.206 new Amends the School Code. Requires the State Board of Education to analyze the use of grant fund requests for a consolidation analysis or consolidation expenses in relation to the School District Reorganization Feasibility Studies. Requires the State Board to create a list of overlapping or bordering school districts with the most similar operating tax rates and percentage of adequacy funding per pupil. Requires the State Board to communicate to the superintendents and school boards of those school districts on the list that the State Board's analysis makes the school district a good candidate for the grant funds. Requires the school board to hold a public hearing to review the State Board's written communication and decide whether to apply for the grant funds. Requires the State Board to report to the General Assembly as to whether the school districts on the list applied for the grant funds, whether a grant was awarded, and what, if any, State Board action was taken in response to the grant-funded consolidation analysis. Requires the State Board to also provide to interested school districts a list of neutral parties to conduct an independent consolidation analysis with the grant funds. LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b A BILL FOR 104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026 HB2966 Introduced , by Rep. Tracy Katz Muhl SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED: 105 ILCS 5/2-3.206 new 105 ILCS 5/2-3.206 new Amends the School Code. Requires the State Board of Education to analyze the use of grant fund requests for a consolidation analysis or consolidation expenses in relation to the School District Reorganization Feasibility Studies. Requires the State Board to create a list of overlapping or bordering school districts with the most similar operating tax rates and percentage of adequacy funding per pupil. Requires the State Board to communicate to the superintendents and school boards of those school districts on the list that the State Board's analysis makes the school district a good candidate for the grant funds. Requires the school board to hold a public hearing to review the State Board's written communication and decide whether to apply for the grant funds. Requires the State Board to report to the General Assembly as to whether the school districts on the list applied for the grant funds, whether a grant was awarded, and what, if any, State Board action was taken in response to the grant-funded consolidation analysis. Requires the State Board to also provide to interested school districts a list of neutral parties to conduct an independent consolidation analysis with the grant funds. LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b A BILL FOR |
---|
| 2 | + | 104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026 HB2966 Introduced , by Rep. Tracy Katz Muhl SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED: |
---|
| 3 | + | 105 ILCS 5/2-3.206 new 105 ILCS 5/2-3.206 new |
---|
| 4 | + | 105 ILCS 5/2-3.206 new |
---|
| 5 | + | Amends the School Code. Requires the State Board of Education to analyze the use of grant fund requests for a consolidation analysis or consolidation expenses in relation to the School District Reorganization Feasibility Studies. Requires the State Board to create a list of overlapping or bordering school districts with the most similar operating tax rates and percentage of adequacy funding per pupil. Requires the State Board to communicate to the superintendents and school boards of those school districts on the list that the State Board's analysis makes the school district a good candidate for the grant funds. Requires the school board to hold a public hearing to review the State Board's written communication and decide whether to apply for the grant funds. Requires the State Board to report to the General Assembly as to whether the school districts on the list applied for the grant funds, whether a grant was awarded, and what, if any, State Board action was taken in response to the grant-funded consolidation analysis. Requires the State Board to also provide to interested school districts a list of neutral parties to conduct an independent consolidation analysis with the grant funds. |
---|
| 6 | + | LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
| 7 | + | LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
| 8 | + | A BILL FOR |
---|
| 9 | + | HB2966LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b HB2966 LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
| 10 | + | HB2966 LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
9 | | - | 7 Sec. 2-3.206. School district reorganization feasibility |
---|
10 | | - | 8 studies; grant program. |
---|
11 | | - | 9 (a) The State Board of Education may award grants to |
---|
12 | | - | 10 school districts for the purpose of incentivizing those |
---|
13 | | - | 11 districts to conduct reorganization feasibility studies. |
---|
14 | | - | 12 (b) To be eligible for a grant under this Section, the |
---|
15 | | - | 13 board of the school district that is applying for the grant |
---|
16 | | - | 14 shall: |
---|
17 | | - | 15 (1) negotiate a proposed agreement to secure the |
---|
18 | | - | 16 services of a third party consultant who will conduct the |
---|
19 | | - | 17 reorganization feasibility study; |
---|
20 | | - | 18 (2) adopt a resolution that is signed by the board |
---|
21 | | - | 19 president of the district and calls for the initiation of |
---|
22 | | - | 20 a school district reorganization feasibility study in |
---|
23 | | - | 21 accordance with the terms of the proposed agreement and |
---|
24 | | - | 22 any rules adopted by the State Board of Education; and |
---|
25 | | - | 23 (3) submit the completed agreement form, the signed |
---|
| 17 | + | 7 Sec. 2-3.206. School district consolidation analysis. The |
---|
| 18 | + | 8 State Board of Education shall analyze the use of grant fund |
---|
| 19 | + | 9 requests for a consolidation analysis or consolidation |
---|
| 20 | + | 10 expenses in relation to the School District Reorganization |
---|
| 21 | + | 11 Feasibility Studies. The State Board shall create a list of |
---|
| 22 | + | 12 overlapping or bordering school districts with the most |
---|
| 23 | + | 13 similar operating tax rates and percentage of adequacy funding |
---|
| 24 | + | 14 per pupil. This list shall be long enough to use the available |
---|
| 25 | + | 15 grant funds, with an alternate list available. |
---|
| 26 | + | 16 The State Board shall communicate, in writing, to the |
---|
| 27 | + | 17 superintendents and school boards of those school districts on |
---|
| 28 | + | 18 the list that the State Board's analysis makes the school |
---|
| 29 | + | 19 district a good candidate for the grant funds. The school |
---|
| 30 | + | 20 board shall hold a public hearing, which may occur during a |
---|
| 31 | + | 21 regular or special meeting, to review the State Board's |
---|
| 32 | + | 22 written communication and decide whether to apply for the |
---|
| 33 | + | 23 grant funds. The State Board shall report to the General |
---|
29 | | - | HB2966 Engrossed LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
30 | | - | |
---|
31 | | - | |
---|
32 | | - | HB2966 Engrossed- 2 -LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b HB2966 Engrossed - 2 - LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
33 | | - | HB2966 Engrossed - 2 - LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
34 | | - | 1 board resolution, and such other information as the State |
---|
35 | | - | 2 Board of Education may, by administrative rule, require, |
---|
36 | | - | 3 to the regional office of education or the executive |
---|
37 | | - | 4 director of the intermediate service center for the |
---|
38 | | - | 5 district for approval. |
---|
39 | | - | 6 (c) Upon receipt of a complete application from a |
---|
40 | | - | 7 district, the regional office of education or the executive |
---|
41 | | - | 8 director of the intermediate service center shall either (i) |
---|
42 | | - | 9 approve the agreement and send the agreement to the State |
---|
43 | | - | 10 Board of Education or (ii) disapprove the agreement and return |
---|
44 | | - | 11 the agreement to the district with a letter of explanation. |
---|
45 | | - | 12 (d) From funds appropriated to it for that purpose, the |
---|
46 | | - | 13 State Board of Education may award grants under this Section |
---|
47 | | - | 14 to districts for which it receives an approved agreement under |
---|
48 | | - | 15 subsection (c) for costs incurred by those districts to |
---|
49 | | - | 16 conduct a reorganization feasibility study. |
---|
50 | | - | 17 (e) To ensure that eligible districts are aware of the |
---|
51 | | - | 18 grant-funding opportunities provided under this Section, the |
---|
52 | | - | 19 State Board of Education shall annually notify the board and |
---|
53 | | - | 20 superintendent of each school district in the State of the |
---|
54 | | - | 21 availability of grant funds for the purpose of conducting |
---|
55 | | - | 22 school district reorganization feasibility studies and shall |
---|
56 | | - | 23 provide with that notice all of the following information: |
---|
57 | | - | 24 (1) information concerning the procedures for applying |
---|
58 | | - | 25 for grant funding under this Section during the next award |
---|
59 | | - | 26 cycle; |
---|
| 37 | + | 104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026 HB2966 Introduced , by Rep. Tracy Katz Muhl SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED: |
---|
| 38 | + | 105 ILCS 5/2-3.206 new 105 ILCS 5/2-3.206 new |
---|
| 39 | + | 105 ILCS 5/2-3.206 new |
---|
| 40 | + | Amends the School Code. Requires the State Board of Education to analyze the use of grant fund requests for a consolidation analysis or consolidation expenses in relation to the School District Reorganization Feasibility Studies. Requires the State Board to create a list of overlapping or bordering school districts with the most similar operating tax rates and percentage of adequacy funding per pupil. Requires the State Board to communicate to the superintendents and school boards of those school districts on the list that the State Board's analysis makes the school district a good candidate for the grant funds. Requires the school board to hold a public hearing to review the State Board's written communication and decide whether to apply for the grant funds. Requires the State Board to report to the General Assembly as to whether the school districts on the list applied for the grant funds, whether a grant was awarded, and what, if any, State Board action was taken in response to the grant-funded consolidation analysis. Requires the State Board to also provide to interested school districts a list of neutral parties to conduct an independent consolidation analysis with the grant funds. |
---|
| 41 | + | LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
| 42 | + | LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
| 43 | + | A BILL FOR |
---|
68 | | - | HB2966 Engrossed- 3 -LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b HB2966 Engrossed - 3 - LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
69 | | - | HB2966 Engrossed - 3 - LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
70 | | - | 1 (2) a description of the total dollar value of grant |
---|
71 | | - | 2 funds that are available to be awarded during the next |
---|
72 | | - | 3 award cycle; and |
---|
73 | | - | 4 (3) a list of third-party consultants who have |
---|
74 | | - | 5 experience conducting feasibility studies in Illinois. |
---|
75 | | - | 6 (f) Every 2 years, each board that receives a notice under |
---|
76 | | - | 7 subsection (e) may include the question of whether to pursue |
---|
77 | | - | 8 grant funding under this Section as an action item on the |
---|
78 | | - | 9 agenda at one of its meetings. |
---|
79 | | - | 10 (g) When issuing grants under this Section, the State |
---|
80 | | - | 11 Board of Education may provide a school district up to the |
---|
81 | | - | 12 maximum reimbursement amount set by the State Board of |
---|
82 | | - | 13 Education, for the purpose of covering all or part of the costs |
---|
83 | | - | 14 borne by the school district to conduct a reorganization |
---|
84 | | - | 15 feasibility study. In awarding grants under this Section, the |
---|
85 | | - | 16 State Board of Education shall prioritize the awarding of |
---|
86 | | - | 17 grants to districts that are contiguous with one another, |
---|
87 | | - | 18 districts that have similar property tax rates, districts with |
---|
88 | | - | 19 similar per-pupil adequacy funding, and, beginning in State |
---|
89 | | - | 20 fiscal year 2030, other districts that have been identified as |
---|
90 | | - | 21 priority districts by the State Board of Education pursuant to |
---|
91 | | - | 22 rules adopted under subsection (i). |
---|
92 | | - | 23 (h) No school district may be awarded a grant under this |
---|
93 | | - | 24 Section in any 2 consecutive award cycles. |
---|
94 | | - | 25 (i) The State Board of Education may adopt any rules it |
---|
95 | | - | 26 deems necessary to implement and administer the program of |
---|
| 52 | + | |
---|
| 53 | + | LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
104 | | - | HB2966 Engrossed- 4 -LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b HB2966 Engrossed - 4 - LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
105 | | - | HB2966 Engrossed - 4 - LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
106 | | - | 1 grant funding established under this Section, including, but |
---|
107 | | - | 2 not limited to, rules establishing the criteria that must be |
---|
108 | | - | 3 met by the third-party consultants who will perform the |
---|
109 | | - | 4 feasibility studies described in this Section, rules |
---|
110 | | - | 5 describing minimum criteria to be included in agreements |
---|
111 | | - | 6 executed with the third-party consultants who will perform the |
---|
112 | | - | 7 feasibility studies described in this Section, and, beginning |
---|
113 | | - | 8 in State fiscal year 2030, rules identifying additional types |
---|
114 | | - | 9 of school districts to be prioritized for grant funding under |
---|
115 | | - | 10 this Section. In State fiscal year 2035, and every 5 years |
---|
116 | | - | 11 thereafter, the State Board of Education shall reevaluate and, |
---|
117 | | - | 12 if necessary, amend the rules identifying additional types of |
---|
118 | | - | 13 school districts to be prioritized for grant funding under |
---|
119 | | - | 14 this Section. |
---|
120 | | - | 15 Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon |
---|
121 | | - | 16 becoming law. |
---|
| 61 | + | |
---|
| 62 | + | |
---|
| 63 | + | HB2966 LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
| 64 | + | |
---|
| 65 | + | |
---|
| 66 | + | HB2966- 2 -LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b HB2966 - 2 - LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|
| 67 | + | HB2966 - 2 - LRB104 11974 LNS 22068 b |
---|