Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB3272

Introduced
2/6/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Refer
3/11/25  
Report Pass
3/20/25  
Engrossed
4/7/25  

Caption

SWIMMING FACILITY UV PROTECT

Impact

If enacted, HB3272 would amend the Swimming Facility Act to include specific employer obligations regarding UV protection. This legislative change is intended to ensure that employees at outdoor aquatic facilities are educated about the risks of UV exposure and that employers take reasonable measures to minimize these risks. The bill emphasizes the need for workplace safety protocols that protect employees' health, potentially influencing how outdoor work environments are managed across the state.

Summary

House Bill 3272 aims to enhance protections for employees working at outdoor aquatic centers against harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation. The bill mandates that employers provide access to shaded structures, encourage sunscreen application, and allow employees to wear sun-protective clothing. This legislation is a response to the growing concern over skin cancer risks associated with excessive sun exposure, particularly for workers in outdoor environments such as pools, beaches, and water parks.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB3272 is generally supportive, as it aims to provide employees with necessary health protections. Proponents argue that this bill reflects a responsibility towards employee welfare, especially for those working in sun-intensive jobs. However, some criticisms may arise regarding the practicality and feasibility of enforcing these requirements, particularly for smaller establishments that may struggle with the additional costs of compliance.

Contention

While HB3272 is advocated as a significant step in employee health protection, concerns regarding the enforcement of the proposed regulations may emerge. Critics might question how employers will be held accountable for providing shade and promoting sun safety. Additionally, the potential financial implications for businesses operating outdoor aquatic centers could be a point of contention, as smaller operators might find it challenging to implement the requirements without incurring significant costs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.