Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

Illinois Senate Bill SB1220 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 01/24/2025

                            104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
 State of Illinois
 2025 and 2026 SB1220 Introduced 1/24/2025, by Sen. Terri Bryant SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED: 730 ILCS 190/10 Amends the Illinois Crime Reduction Act of 2009. Provides that the policies, rules, and regulations adopted by the Parole Division and the Prisoner Review Board shall authorize and implement the use by the Department of Corrections of drug detecting scanning devices for supervised individuals packages and mail. Provides that the policies, rules, and regulations of the Department of Corrections shall authorize and implement the Department of Corrections use of drug detecting scanning devices for prisoners packages and mail for suspected drugs. LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b   A BILL FOR 104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
 State of Illinois
 2025 and 2026 SB1220 Introduced 1/24/2025, by Sen. Terri Bryant SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:  730 ILCS 190/10 730 ILCS 190/10  Amends the Illinois Crime Reduction Act of 2009. Provides that the policies, rules, and regulations adopted by the Parole Division and the Prisoner Review Board shall authorize and implement the use by the Department of Corrections of drug detecting scanning devices for supervised individuals packages and mail. Provides that the policies, rules, and regulations of the Department of Corrections shall authorize and implement the Department of Corrections use of drug detecting scanning devices for prisoners packages and mail for suspected drugs.  LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b     LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b   A BILL FOR
104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
 State of Illinois
 2025 and 2026 SB1220 Introduced 1/24/2025, by Sen. Terri Bryant SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
730 ILCS 190/10 730 ILCS 190/10
730 ILCS 190/10
Amends the Illinois Crime Reduction Act of 2009. Provides that the policies, rules, and regulations adopted by the Parole Division and the Prisoner Review Board shall authorize and implement the use by the Department of Corrections of drug detecting scanning devices for supervised individuals packages and mail. Provides that the policies, rules, and regulations of the Department of Corrections shall authorize and implement the Department of Corrections use of drug detecting scanning devices for prisoners packages and mail for suspected drugs.
LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b     LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
    LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
A BILL FOR
SB1220LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b   SB1220  LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
  SB1220  LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
1  AN ACT concerning criminal law.
2  Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3  represented in the General Assembly:
4  Section 5. The Illinois Crime Reduction Act of 2009 is
5  amended by changing Section 10 as follows:
6  (730 ILCS 190/10)
7  Sec. 10. Evidence-based programming.
8  (a) Purpose. Research and practice have identified new
9  strategies and policies that can result in a significant
10  reduction in recidivism rates and the successful local
11  reintegration of offenders. The purpose of this Section is to
12  ensure that State and local agencies direct their resources to
13  services and programming that have been demonstrated to be
14  effective in reducing recidivism and reintegrating offenders
15  into the locality.
16  (b) Evidence-based programming in local supervision.
17  (1) The Parole Division of the Department of
18  Corrections and the Prisoner Review Board shall adopt
19  policies, rules, and regulations that, within the first
20  year of the adoption, validation, and utilization of the
21  statewide, standardized risk assessment tool described in
22  this Act, result in at least 25% of supervised individuals
23  being supervised in accordance with evidence-based

 

104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
 State of Illinois
 2025 and 2026 SB1220 Introduced 1/24/2025, by Sen. Terri Bryant SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
730 ILCS 190/10 730 ILCS 190/10
730 ILCS 190/10
Amends the Illinois Crime Reduction Act of 2009. Provides that the policies, rules, and regulations adopted by the Parole Division and the Prisoner Review Board shall authorize and implement the use by the Department of Corrections of drug detecting scanning devices for supervised individuals packages and mail. Provides that the policies, rules, and regulations of the Department of Corrections shall authorize and implement the Department of Corrections use of drug detecting scanning devices for prisoners packages and mail for suspected drugs.
LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b     LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
    LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
A BILL FOR

 

 

730 ILCS 190/10



    LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b

 

 



 

  SB1220  LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b


SB1220- 2 -LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b   SB1220 - 2 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
  SB1220 - 2 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
1  practices; within 3 years of the adoption, validation, and
2  utilization of the statewide, standardized risk assessment
3  tool result in at least 50% of supervised individuals
4  being supervised in accordance with evidence-based
5  practices; and within 5 years of the adoption, validation,
6  and utilization of the statewide, standardized risk
7  assessment tool result in at least 75% of supervised
8  individuals being supervised in accordance with
9  evidence-based practices. The policies, rules, and
10  regulations shall:
11  (A) Provide for a standardized individual case
12  plan that follows the offender through the criminal
13  justice system (including in-prison if the supervised
14  individual is in prison) that is:
15  (i) Based on the assets of the individual as
16  well as his or her risks and needs identified
17  through the assessment tool as described in this
18  Act.
19  (ii) Comprised of treatment and supervision
20  services appropriate to achieve the purpose of
21  this Act.
22  (iii) Consistently updated, based on program
23  participation by the supervised individual and
24  other behavior modification exhibited by the
25  supervised individual.
26  (B) Concentrate resources and services on

 

 

  SB1220 - 2 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b


SB1220- 3 -LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b   SB1220 - 3 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
  SB1220 - 3 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
1  high-risk offenders.
2  (C) Provide for the use of evidence-based
3  programming related to education, job training,
4  cognitive behavioral therapy, and other programming
5  designed to reduce criminal behavior.
6  (C-1) Authorize and implement the use by the
7  Department of Corrections of drug detecting scanning
8  devices for supervised individuals packages and mail.
9  (D) Establish a system of graduated responses.
10  (i) The system shall set forth a menu of
11  presumptive responses for the most common types of
12  supervision violations.
13  (ii) The system shall be guided by the model
14  list of intermediate sanctions created by the
15  Probation Services Division of the State of
16  Illinois pursuant to subsection (1) of Section 15
17  of the Probation and Probation Officers Act and
18  the system of intermediate sanctions created by
19  the Chief Judge of each circuit court pursuant to
20  Section 5-6-1 of the Unified Code of Corrections.
21  (iii) The system of responses shall take into
22  account factors such as the severity of the
23  current violation; the supervised individual's
24  risk level as determined by a validated assessment
25  tool described in this Act; the supervised
26  individual's assets; his or her previous criminal

 

 

  SB1220 - 3 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b


SB1220- 4 -LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b   SB1220 - 4 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
  SB1220 - 4 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
1  record; and the number and severity of any
2  previous supervision violations.
3  (iv) The system shall also define positive
4  reinforcements that supervised individuals may
5  receive for compliance with conditions of
6  supervision.
7  (v) Response to violations should be swift and
8  certain and should be imposed as soon as
9  practicable but no longer than 3 working days of
10  detection of the violation behavior.
11  (vi) The system of graduated responses shall
12  be published on the Department of Corrections
13  website for public view.
14  (2) Conditions of local supervision (probation and
15  mandatory supervised release). Conditions of local
16  supervision whether imposed by a sentencing judge or the
17  Prisoner Review Board shall be imposed in accordance with
18  the offender's risks, assets, and needs as identified
19  through the assessment tool described in this Act.
20  (3) The Department of Corrections and the Prisoner
21  Review Board shall annually publish an exemplar copy of
22  any evidence-based assessments, questionnaires, or other
23  instruments used to set conditions of release.
24  (c) Evidence-based in-prison programming.
25  (1) The Department of Corrections shall adopt
26  policies, rules, and regulations that, within the first

 

 

  SB1220 - 4 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b


SB1220- 5 -LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b   SB1220 - 5 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
  SB1220 - 5 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
1  year of the adoption, validation, and utilization of the
2  statewide, standardized risk assessment tool described in
3  this Act, result in at least 25% of incarcerated
4  individuals receiving services and programming in
5  accordance with evidence-based practices; within 3 years
6  of the adoption, validation, and utilization of the
7  statewide, standardized risk assessment tool result in at
8  least 50% of incarcerated individuals receiving services
9  and programming in accordance with evidence-based
10  practices; and within 5 years of the adoption, validation,
11  and utilization of the statewide, standardized risk
12  assessment tool result in at least 75% of incarcerated
13  individuals receiving services and programming in
14  accordance with evidence-based practices. The policies,
15  rules, and regulations shall:
16  (A) Provide for the use and development of a case
17  plan based on the risks, assets, and needs identified
18  through the assessment tool as described in this Act.
19  The case plan should be used to determine in-prison
20  programming; should be continuously updated based on
21  program participation by the prisoner and other
22  behavior modification exhibited by the prisoner; and
23  should be used when creating the case plan described
24  in subsection (b).
25  (B) Provide for the use of evidence-based
26  programming related to education, job training,

 

 

  SB1220 - 5 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b


SB1220- 6 -LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b   SB1220 - 6 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
  SB1220 - 6 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
1  cognitive behavioral therapy and other evidence-based
2  programming.
3  (C) Establish education programs based on a
4  teacher to student ratio of no more than 1:30.
5  (D) Expand the use of drug prisons, modeled after
6  the Sheridan Correctional Center, to provide
7  sufficient drug treatment and other support services
8  to non-violent inmates with a history of substance
9  abuse.
10  (E) Establish and implement the use of drug
11  detecting devices for the scanning of all prisoner
12  mail and packages for suspected drugs.
13  (2) Participation and completion of programming by
14  prisoners can impact earned time credit as determined
15  under Section 3-6-3 of the Unified Code of Corrections.
16  (3) The Department of Corrections shall provide its
17  employees with intensive and ongoing training and
18  professional development services to support the
19  implementation of evidence-based practices. The training
20  and professional development services shall include
21  assessment techniques, case planning, cognitive behavioral
22  training, risk reduction and intervention strategies,
23  effective communication skills, substance abuse treatment
24  education and other topics identified by the Department or
25  its employees.
26  (d) The Parole Division of the Department of Corrections

 

 

  SB1220 - 6 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b


SB1220- 7 -LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b   SB1220 - 7 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
  SB1220 - 7 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
1  and the Prisoner Review Board shall provide their employees
2  with intensive and ongoing training and professional
3  development services to support the implementation of
4  evidence-based practices. The training and professional
5  development services shall include assessment techniques, case
6  planning, cognitive behavioral training, risk reduction and
7  intervention strategies, effective communication skills,
8  substance abuse treatment education, and other topics
9  identified by the agencies or their employees.
10  (e) The Department of Corrections, the Prisoner Review
11  Board, and other correctional entities referenced in the
12  policies, rules, and regulations of this Act shall design,
13  implement, and make public a system to evaluate the
14  effectiveness of evidence-based practices in increasing public
15  safety and in successful reintegration of those under
16  supervision into the locality. Annually, each agency shall
17  submit to the Sentencing Policy Advisory Council a
18  comprehensive report on the success of implementing
19  evidence-based practices. The data compiled and analyzed by
20  the Council shall be delivered annually to the Governor and
21  the General Assembly.
22  (f) The Department of Corrections and the Prisoner Review
23  Board shall release a report annually published on their
24  websites that reports the following information about the
25  usage of electronic monitoring and GPS monitoring as a
26  condition of parole and mandatory supervised release during

 

 

  SB1220 - 7 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b


SB1220- 8 -LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b   SB1220 - 8 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
  SB1220 - 8 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
1  the prior calendar year:
2  (1) demographic data of individuals on electronic
3  monitoring and GPS monitoring, separated by the following
4  categories:
5  (A) race or ethnicity;
6  (B) gender; and
7  (C) age;
8  (2) incarceration data of individuals subject to
9  conditions of electronic or GPS monitoring, separated by
10  the following categories:
11  (A) highest class of offense for which the
12  individuals are currently serving a term of release;
13  and
14  (B) length of imprisonment served prior to the
15  current release period;
16  (3) the number of individuals subject to conditions of
17  electronic or GPS monitoring, separated by the following
18  categories:
19  (A) the number of individuals subject to
20  monitoring under Section 5-8A-6 of the Unified Code of
21  Corrections;
22  (B) the number of individuals subject monitoring
23  under Section 5-8A-7 of the Unified Code of
24  Corrections;
25  (C) the number of individuals subject to
26  monitoring under a discretionary order of the Prisoner

 

 

  SB1220 - 8 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b


SB1220- 9 -LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b   SB1220 - 9 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
  SB1220 - 9 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
1  Review Board at the time of their release; and
2  (D) the number of individuals subject to
3  monitoring as a sanction for violations of parole or
4  mandatory supervised release, separated by the
5  following categories:
6  (i) the number of individuals subject to
7  monitoring as part of a graduated sanctions
8  program; and
9  (ii) the number of individuals subject to
10  monitoring as a new condition of re-release after
11  a revocation hearing before the Prisoner Review
12  Board;
13  (4) the number of discretionary monitoring orders
14  issued by the Prisoner Review Board, separated by the
15  following categories:
16  (A) less than 30 days;
17  (B) 31 to 60 days;
18  (C) 61 to 90 days;
19  (D) 91 to 120 days;
20  (E) 121 to 150 days;
21  (F) 151 to 180 days;
22  (G) 181 to 364 days;
23  (H) 365 days or more; and
24  (I) duration of release term;
25  (5) the number of discretionary monitoring orders by
26  the Board which removed or terminated monitoring prior to

 

 

  SB1220 - 9 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b


SB1220- 10 -LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b   SB1220 - 10 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
  SB1220 - 10 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
1  the completion of the original period ordered;
2  (6) the number and severity category for sanctions
3  imposed on individuals on electronic or GPS monitoring,
4  separated by the following categories:
5  (A) absconding from electronic monitoring or GPS;
6  (B) tampering or removing the electronic
7  monitoring or GPS device;
8  (C) unauthorized leaving of the residence;
9  (D) presence of the individual in a prohibited
10  area; or
11  (E) other violations of the terms of the
12  electronic monitoring program;
13  (7) the number of individuals for whom a parole
14  revocation case was filed for failure to comply with the
15  terms of electronic or GPS monitoring, separated by the
16  following categories:
17  (A) cases when failure to comply with the terms of
18  monitoring was the sole violation alleged; and
19  (B) cases when failure to comply with the terms of
20  monitoring was alleged in conjunction with other
21  alleged violations;
22  (8) residential data for individuals subject to
23  electronic or GPS monitoring, separated by the following
24  categories:
25  (A) the county of the residence address for
26  individuals subject to electronic or GPS monitoring as

 

 

  SB1220 - 10 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b


SB1220- 11 -LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b   SB1220 - 11 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
  SB1220 - 11 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
1  a condition of their release; and
2  (B) for counties with a population over 3,000,000,
3  the zip codes of the residence address for individuals
4  subject to electronic or GPS monitoring as a condition
5  of their release;
6  (9) the number of individuals for whom parole
7  revocation cases were filed due to violations of paragraph
8  (1) of subsection (a) of Section 3-3-7 of the Unified Code
9  of Corrections, separated by the following categories:
10  (A) the number of individuals whose violation of
11  paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of Section 3-3-7 of
12  the Unified Code of Corrections allegedly occurred
13  while the individual was subject to conditions of
14  electronic or GPS monitoring;
15  (B) the number of individuals who had violations
16  of paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of Section 3-3-7 of
17  the Unified Code of Corrections alleged against them
18  who were never subject to electronic or GPS monitoring
19  during their current term of release; and
20  (C) the number of individuals who had violations
21  of paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of Section 3-3-7 of
22  the Unified Code of Corrections alleged against them
23  who were subject to electronic or GPS monitoring for
24  any period of time during their current term of their
25  release, but who were not subject to such monitoring
26  at the time of the alleged violation of paragraph (1)

 

 

  SB1220 - 11 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b


SB1220- 12 -LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b   SB1220 - 12 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b
  SB1220 - 12 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b

 

 

  SB1220 - 12 - LRB104 03941 RLC 13965 b