Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

Illinois Senate Bill SB1797

Introduced
2/6/25  
Refer
2/6/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Report Pass
4/3/25  
Engrossed
4/10/25  

Caption

DIGITAL ASSETS & CONS PROT ACT

Impact

If enacted, SB1797 would significantly alter the regulatory landscape for digital asset businesses operating in the state. It establishes a framework for registering such businesses, mandates them to conduct risk assessments, and requires clear disclosures regarding the nature and risks of digital assets. The act also introduces provisions for enforcement mechanisms against violators and aims to elevate consumer confidence in digital asset transactions through increased oversight.

Summary

SB1797, also known as the Digital Assets and Consumer Protection Act, aims to regulate digital asset businesses by requiring them to register with the Department and adhere to consumer protection standards. It necessitates comprehensive risk assessments, sharing of detailed disclosures about fees, and potential insurance protections for residents engaging in digital asset transactions. This legislative intent is to safeguard consumers from risks associated with digital assets and to ensure transparency and accountability within the digital asset market.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1797 reflects a supportive view towards protecting residents from the potential pitfalls of digital asset investments. Proponents argue that this legislation is essential in creating a safer environment for consumers, acknowledging the rapid growth of the digital asset market. However, some stakeholders express concerns about the burden the regulatory framework may place on smaller digital asset businesses, fearing it could stifle innovation and accessibility in the market.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between consumer protections and business flexibility. Critics point out that stringent disclosure and regulatory requirements may deter new entrants into the market or burden existing businesses with excessive compliance costs. Additionally, there is a debate over the implications of this act on existing federal regulations governing digital assets, highlighting the challenge of integrating state and federal oversight in this complex and rapidly evolving arena.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

IL HB0742

REGULATION-TECH

IL HB3467

BANKING-VARIOUS

IL SB1512

CONSUMER FIN PROTECTION LAW

KS HB2334

Enacting the Kansas protected cell captive insurance company act, providing for the redomestication of a foreign or alien captive insurance company and updating certain terms, requirements and conditions of the captive insurance act, reducing insurance company premium tax rates, creating parity between the insurance agent and public adjuster licensing requirements, authorizing insurers to file certain travel insurance policies under the accident and health line of insurance and authorizing the commissioner of insurance to select and announce the version of certain instructions, calculations and documents in effect for the upcoming calendar year and cause such announcement to be published in the Kansas register not later than December 1 of the current year.

AR SB230

To Repeal The Arkansas Trust Institutions Act; And To Create The Arkansas Trust Institutions Act Of 2025.

KS HB2342

Authorizing the attorney general and the state gaming agency to receive certain additional criminal history records, updating criminal history record language related to the state bank commissioner, requiring the secretary of labor to conduct criminal history record checks on employees who have access to federal tax information and authorizing the secretary of commerce to conduct such checks on final applicants for and employees in certain sensitive positions.

TX SB1213

Relating to consumer protections in the purchase of life settlement contracts; imposing penalties.

IL HB2595

BUSINESS TRUTH IN LENDING ACT