If passed, this amendment will be presented to the voters of Illinois for approval or rejection at the next general election occurring at least six months post-adoption. Hence, the bill establishes a timeline that could influence various aspects of legislative operations and ultimately shape how laws are made within the state of Illinois moving forward.
The expected impact of SJRCA0006 is significant on state laws and the legislative process. By introducing mandatory waiting periods, the amendment aims to promote greater transparency and accountability in the legislative process. Proponents argue that this change will allow elected officials and the public to better understand the implications of new laws. It could also reduce the likelihood of hasty decision-making that could lead to poorly constructed legislation or public outcry. The amendment's adoption would represent a considerable shift in the operational dynamics of the General Assembly, fostering a more deliberative approach to lawmaking.
SJRCA0006 is a proposed Senate Joint Resolution Constitutional Amendment introduced in 2025 by Senator Jason Plummer, which seeks to amend Article IV, Section 8 of the Illinois Constitution. This amendment stipulates that the final passage of any bill or amendment, except for appropriation bills, shall not occur until at least 24 hours after its introduction. For bills specifically concerning appropriations, the waiting period is extended to 72 hours. This proposal aims to enhance the legislative process by ensuring that lawmakers have sufficient time to review proposed legislation before it is voted on.
Opposition to SJRCA0006 may arise primarily from factions within the legislature who perceive the waiting periods as unnecessary delays that could obstruct timely legislative action, particularly during emergencies or rapid response situations. Critics might argue that such measures could hinder the efficiency of the legislative process, particularly for bills that require urgent attention, like financial appropriations. Additionally, there could be concerns that these waiting periods may limit the responsiveness of lawmakers to constituents' urgent needs, ultimately complicating the governance process.