Introduced Version
HOUSE BILL No. 1329
_____
DIGEST OF INTRODUCED BILL
Citations Affected: IC 31-9-2-67.1; IC 31-14; IC 31-17.
Synopsis: Physical custody and parenting time. Adds a rebuttable
presumption in child custody proceedings that: (1) joint physical
custody is in the best interests of the child; and (2) equal parenting time
is in the best interests of the child. Provides that a court, in determining
custody of a child, shall consider evidence that relocation of the child
to an area outside the jurisdiction of the court is not in the child's best
interests, unless written consent to the relocation is provided to the
court by: (1) both parents of the child; and (2) the child's de facto
custodian, if the court finds that the child has been cared for by a de
facto custodian. Provides that the default joint physical custody or
parenting time schedule is to alternate weekly physical custody of the
child, unless the parents submit an alternative schedule that is approved
by the court. Provides that a noncustodial parent is entitled to
reasonable parenting time rights unless the court finds by clear and
convincing evidence that parenting time might: (1) endanger the child's
physical health and well-being; or (2) significantly impair the child's
emotional development. Provides that if a court finds that granting
parenting time to a noncustodial parent is not in the child's best
interests, the court shall document the court's findings of fact and
conclusions in writing and provide the written findings and conclusions
to: (1) both parents of the child; and (2) the de facto custodian of the
child, if the court finds that the child has been cared for by a de facto
custodian. Provides that a court shall not restrict a parent's parenting
time rights unless the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that
the parenting time might endanger the child's physical health or
significantly impair the child's emotional development. Provides that
(Continued next page)
Effective: July 1, 2022.
VanNatter
January 11, 2022, read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary.
2022 IN 1329—LS 7231/DI 119 Digest Continued
a court shall (rather than may, under current law) provide in a parenting
time order or modification of a parenting time order for a security,
bond, or other guarantee to secure enforcement of the parenting time
order. Provides that a noncustodial parent may make up parenting time
missed as the result of: (1) the noncustodial parent's: (A) active
deployment in the armed forces of the United States; (B) active service
in a state, county, or local law enforcement agency; (C) active service
in a fire department; or (D) employment related trips or training; or (2)
other factors the court considers to have directly impeded participation
of the parent in parenting time. Provides that a noncustodial parent who
is barred by a custodial parent from exercising parenting time rights
granted to the noncustodial parent by a court may file for an injunction
against the custodial parent in a court that has jurisdiction over a child
custody proceeding with regard to the child. Provides that if a court: (1)
issues an injunction or temporary restraining order with regard to a
custodial parent's denial of court ordered parenting time to the child's
noncustodial parent; and (2) finds that the custodial parent has, without
justifiable cause, violated the injunction or temporary restraining order;
the court may modify custody of the child.
2022 IN 1329—LS 7231/DI 1192022 IN 1329—LS 7231/DI 119 Introduced
Second Regular Session of the 122nd General Assembly (2022)
PRINTING CODE. Amendments: Whenever an existing statute (or a section of the Indiana
Constitution) is being amended, the text of the existing provision will appear in this style type,
additions will appear in this style type, and deletions will appear in this style type.
Additions: Whenever a new statutory provision is being enacted (or a new constitutional
provision adopted), the text of the new provision will appear in this style type. Also, the
word NEW will appear in that style type in the introductory clause of each SECTION that adds
a new provision to the Indiana Code or the Indiana Constitution.
Conflict reconciliation: Text in a statute in this style type or this style type reconciles conflicts
between statutes enacted by the 2021 Regular Session of the General Assembly.
HOUSE BILL No. 1329
A BILL FOR AN ACT to amend the Indiana Code concerning
family law and juvenile law.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Indiana:
1 SECTION 1. IC 31-9-2-67.1 IS ADDED TO THE INDIANA CODE
2 AS A NEW SECTION TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY
3 1, 2022]: Sec. 67.1. "Joint physical custody", for purposes of
4 IC 31-14 and IC 31-17, means that each parent or custodian has
5 equal, or nearly equal, periods of physical custody of the child.
6 SECTION 2. IC 31-14-13-2 IS AMENDED TO READ AS
7 FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2022]: Sec. 2. (a) The court shall
8 determine custody in accordance with the best interests of the child. In
9 determining the child's best interests, there is not a presumption
10 favoring either parent, but there is a rebuttable presumption that
11 joint physical custody is in the best interests of the child. The court
12 shall consider all relevant factors, including the following:
13 (1) The age and sex of the child.
14 (2) The wishes of the child's parents.
15 (3) The wishes of the child, with more consideration given to the
2022 IN 1329—LS 7231/DI 119 2
1 child's wishes if the child is at least fourteen (14) years of age.
2 (4) The interaction and interrelationship of the child with:
3 (A) the child's parents;
4 (B) the child's siblings; and
5 (C) any other person who may significantly affect the child's
6 best interest.
7 (5) The child's adjustment to home, school, and community.
8 (6) The mental and physical health of all individuals involved.
9 (7) Evidence of a pattern of domestic or family violence by either
10 parent.
11 (8) Evidence that relocation of the child to an area outside the
12 jurisdiction of the court under this chapter is not in the child's
13 best interests, unless written consent to relocation of the child
14 to an area outside the jurisdiction of the court is provided to
15 the court by:
16 (A) both parents of the child; and
17 (B) the child's de facto custodian, if the court finds under
18 section 2.5 of this chapter that the child has been cared for
19 by a de facto custodian.
20 (8) (9) Evidence that the child has been cared for by a de facto
21 custodian, and if the evidence is sufficient, the court shall
22 consider the factors described in section 2.5(b) of this chapter.
23 (b) If the court enters an order for joint physical custody, the
24 parents shall alternate weekly physical custody of the child, unless
25 the parents submit an alternative schedule that is approved by the
26 court.
27 SECTION 3. IC 31-14-14-1, AS AMENDED BY P.L.223-2019,
28 SECTION 1, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
29 JULY 1, 2022]: Sec. 1. (a) A noncustodial parent is entitled to
30 reasonable parenting time rights unless the court finds after a hearing,
31 by clear and convincing evidence, that parenting time might:
32 (1) endanger the child's physical health and well-being; or
33 (2) significantly impair the child's emotional development.
34 (b) The court may interview the child in chambers to assist the court
35 in determining the child's perception of whether parenting time by the
36 noncustodial parent might endanger the child's physical health or
37 significantly impair the child's emotional development.
38 (c) In a hearing under subsection (a), there is a rebuttable
39 presumption that a person who has been convicted of:
40 (1) child molesting (IC 35-42-4-3); or
41 (2) child exploitation (IC 35-42-4-4(b) or IC 35-42-4-4(c));
42 might endanger the child's physical health and well-being or
2022 IN 1329—LS 7231/DI 119 3
1 significantly impair the child's emotional development.
2 (d) Except as provided in subsection (e), if a court grants parenting
3 time rights to a person who has been convicted of:
4 (1) child molesting (IC 35-42-4-3); or
5 (2) child exploitation (IC 35-42-4-4(b) or IC 35-42-4-4(c));
6 there is a rebuttable presumption that the parenting time with the child
7 must be supervised.
8 (e) If a court grants parenting time rights to a person who has been
9 convicted of:
10 (1) child molesting (IC 35-42-4-3); or
11 (2) child exploitation (IC 35-42-4-4(b) or IC 35-42-4-4(c));
12 within the previous five (5) years, the court shall order that the
13 parenting time with the child must be supervised.
14 (f) The court may permit counsel to be present at the interview. If
15 counsel is present:
16 (1) a record may be made of the interview; and
17 (2) the interview may be made part of the record for purposes of
18 appeal.
19 (g) If the court does not make a finding that parenting time by
20 the noncustodial parent might endanger the child's physical health
21 and well-being or significantly impair the child's emotional
22 development as described in subsection (a), there is a rebuttable
23 presumption that it is in the best interests of the child for the
24 amount of parenting time by each parent to be as equal as possible.
25 (h) If the court finds that granting parenting time to a
26 noncustodial parent is not in the child's best interests, the court
27 shall document the court's findings of fact and conclusions in
28 writing and provide the written findings and conclusions to:
29 (1) both parents of the child; and
30 (2) the child's de facto custodian, if the court finds under
31 section IC 31-14-13-2.5 that the child has been cared for by a
32 de facto custodian.
33 (i) The default parenting time schedule is for parenting time to
34 alternate weekly between the parents, unless the parents submit an
35 alternative schedule that is approved by the court.
36 SECTION 4. IC 31-14-14-2, AS AMENDED BY P.L.68-2005,
37 SECTION 20, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
38 JULY 1, 2022]: Sec. 2. The court may modify an order granting or
39 denying parenting time rights whenever modification would serve the
40 best interests of the child. However, the court shall not restrict a
41 parent's parenting time rights unless the court finds by clear and
42 convincing evidence that the parenting time might endanger the
2022 IN 1329—LS 7231/DI 119 4
1 child's physical health or significantly impair the child's emotional
2 development.
3 SECTION 5. IC 31-14-14-2.5, AS AMENDED BY P.L.68-2005,
4 SECTION 21, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
5 JULY 1, 2022]: Sec. 2.5. The court may shall provide in:
6 (1) a parenting time order; or
7 (2) a modification of a parenting time order;
8 for the a security, bond, or other guarantee that is satisfactory to secure
9 enforcement of the parenting time order.
10 SECTION 6. IC 31-14-14-4, AS AMENDED BY P.L.68-2005,
11 SECTION 22, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
12 JULY 1, 2022]: Sec. 4. A noncustodial parent who misses parenting
13 time as the result of:
14 (1) participation in: an activity of:
15 (1) (A) an activity of the Indiana National Guard; or
16 (2) (B) an activity of a reserve component of the armed forces
17 of the United States;
18 (C) an active deployment in the armed forces of the United
19 States;
20 (D) active service in a state, county, or local law
21 enforcement agency;
22 (E) active service in a fire department; or
23 (F) employment related trips or training; or
24 (2) other factors the court considers to have directly impeded
25 participation of the parent in parenting time with the child;
26 may make up the lost parenting time as provided in IC 10-16-7-22.
27 SECTION 7. IC 31-14-15-1, AS AMENDED BY P.L.68-2005,
28 SECTION 24, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
29 JULY 1, 2022]: Sec. 1. A noncustodial parent who:
30 (1) has been granted parenting time rights with a child who lives
31 with the custodial parent;
32 (2) regularly pays support ordered by a court for the child; and
33 (3) is barred by a custodial parent from exercising parenting time
34 rights ordered for the noncustodial parent and the child;
35 may file, in the court that has jurisdiction over the paternity action or
36 jurisdiction over a child custody proceeding with regard to the
37 child under IC 31-17-2-1, an application for an injunction against the
38 custodial parent under Rule 65 of the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure.
39 SECTION 8. IC 31-14-15-4, AS AMENDED BY P.L.68-2005,
40 SECTION 26, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
41 JULY 1, 2022]: Sec. 4. A court that finds a violation without justifiable
42 cause by a custodial parent of an injunction or a temporary restraining
2022 IN 1329—LS 7231/DI 119 5
1 order issued under this chapter (or IC 31-6-6.1-12.1 before its repeal):
2 (1) shall find the custodial parent in contempt of court;
3 (2) shall order the exercise of parenting time that was not
4 exercised due to the violation under this section (or
5 IC 31-6-6.1-12.1(e) before its repeal) at a time the court considers
6 compatible with the schedules of the noncustodial parent and the
7 child;
8 (3) may order payment by the custodial parent of reasonable
9 attorney's fees, costs, and expenses to the noncustodial parent;
10 and
11 (4) may order the custodial parent to perform community
12 restitution or service without compensation in a manner specified
13 by the court; and
14 (5) may modify custody of the child under IC 31-14-13-8.
15 SECTION 9. IC 31-17-2-8, AS AMENDED BY P.L.194-2017,
16 SECTION 14, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
17 JULY 1, 2022]: Sec. 8. (a) The court shall determine custody and enter
18 a custody order in accordance with the best interests of the child. In
19 determining the best interests of the child, there is no presumption
20 favoring either parent, but there is a rebuttable presumption that
21 joint physical custody is in the best interests of the child. The court
22 shall consider all relevant factors, including the following:
23 (1) The age and sex of the child.
24 (2) The wishes of the child's parent or parents.
25 (3) The wishes of the child, with more consideration given to the
26 child's wishes if the child is at least fourteen (14) years of age.
27 (4) The interaction and interrelationship of the child with:
28 (A) the child's parent or parents;
29 (B) the child's sibling; and
30 (C) any other person who may significantly affect the child's
31 best interests.
32 (5) The child's adjustment to the child's:
33 (A) home;
34 (B) school; and
35 (C) community.
36 (6) The mental and physical health of all individuals involved.
37 (7) Evidence of a pattern of domestic or family violence by either
38 parent.
39 (8) Evidence that relocation of the child to an area outside the
40 jurisdiction of the court under this chapter is not in the child's
41 best interests, unless written consent for relocation of the
42 child to an area outside the jurisdiction of the court is
2022 IN 1329—LS 7231/DI 119 6
1 provided to the court by:
2 (A) both parents of the child; and
3 (B) the child's de facto custodian, if the court finds under
4 section 8.5 of this chapter that the child has been cared for
5 by a de facto custodian.
6 (8) (9) Evidence that the child has been cared for by a de facto
7 custodian, and if the evidence is sufficient, the court shall
8 consider the factors described in section 8.5(b) of this chapter.
9 (9) (10) A designation in a power of attorney of:
10 (A) the child's parent; or
11 (B) a person found to be a de facto custodian of the child.
12 (b) If the court enters an order for joint physical custody, the
13 parents shall alternate physical custody of the child weekly, unless
14 the parents submit an alternative schedule that is approved by the
15 court.
16 SECTION 10. IC 31-17-4-1, AS AMENDED BY P.L.146-2021,
17 SECTION 7, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
18 JULY 1, 2022]: Sec. 1. (a) Subject to subsections (d) and (e) and
19 subject to section 1.1 of this chapter, a parent not granted custody of
20 the child is entitled to reasonable parenting time rights unless the court
21 finds after a hearing, by clear and convincing evidence, that parenting
22 time by the noncustodial parent might endanger the child's physical
23 health or significantly impair the child's emotional development.
24 (b) The court may interview the child in chambers to assist the court
25 in determining the child's perception of whether parenting time by the
26 noncustodial parent might endanger the child's physical health or
27 significantly impair the child's emotional development.
28 (c) The court may permit counsel to be present at the interview. If
29 counsel is present:
30 (1) a record may be made of the interview; and
31 (2) the interview may be made part of the record for purposes of
32 appeal.
33 (d) Except as provided in subsection (e), if a court grants parenting
34 time rights to a person who has been convicted of:
35 (1) child molesting (IC 35-42-4-3); or
36 (2) child exploitation (IC 35-42-4-4(b) or IC 35-42-4-4(c));
37 there is a rebuttable presumption that the parenting time with the child
38 must be supervised.
39 (e) If a court grants parenting time rights to a person who has been
40 convicted of:
41 (1) child molesting (IC 35-42-4-3); or
42 (2) child exploitation (IC 35-42-4-4(b) or IC 35-42-4-4(c));
2022 IN 1329—LS 7231/DI 119 7
1 within the previous five (5) years, the court shall order that the
2 parenting time with the child must be supervised.
3 (f) If the court does not make a finding that parenting time by
4 the noncustodial parent might endanger the child's physical health
5 or significantly impair the child's emotional development as
6 described in subsection (a), there is a rebuttable presumption that
7 it is in the best interests of the child for the amount of parenting
8 time by each parent to be as equal as possible.
9 (g) If the court finds that granting parenting time to a
10 noncustodial parent is not in the child's best interests, the court
11 shall document the court's findings of fact and conclusions in
12 writing and provide the written findings and conclusions to:
13 (1) both parents of the child; and
14 (2) the child's de facto custodian, if the court finds under
15 IC 31-17-2-8.5 that the child has been cared for by a de facto
16 custodian.
17 (h) The default parenting time schedule is for parenting time to
18 alternate weekly between the parents, unless the parents submit an
19 alternative schedule that is approved by the court.
20 SECTION 11. IC 31-17-4-2, AS AMENDED BY P.L.68-2005,
21 SECTION 46, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
22 JULY 1, 2022]: Sec. 2. The court may modify an order granting or
23 denying parenting time rights whenever modification would serve the
24 best interests of the child. However, the court shall not restrict a
25 parent's parenting time rights unless the court finds by clear and
26 convincing evidence that the parenting time might endanger the child's
27 physical health or significantly impair the child's emotional
28 development.
29 SECTION 12. IC 31-17-4-2.5, AS AMENDED BY P.L.68-2005,
30 SECTION 47, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
31 JULY 1, 2022]: Sec. 2.5. The court may shall provide in:
32 (1) a parenting time order; or
33 (2) a modification to a parenting time order;
34 for the security, bond, or other guarantee that is satisfactory to the court
35 to secure enforcement of the provisions of the parenting time order.
36 SECTION 13. IC 31-17-4-4, AS AMENDED BY P.L.68-2005,
37 SECTION 49, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
38 JULY 1, 2022]: Sec. 4. A noncustodial parent who:
39 (1) has been granted parenting time rights with a child who lives
40 with the custodial parent;
41 (2) regularly pays support ordered by a court for the child; and
42 (3) is barred by a custodial parent from exercising parenting time
2022 IN 1329—LS 7231/DI 119 8
1 rights ordered for the noncustodial parent and the child;
2 may file, in the court that has jurisdiction over the dissolution of
3 marriage or jurisdiction over a child custody proceeding with
4 regard to the child under IC 31-17-2-1, an application for an
5 injunction against the custodial parent under Rule 65 of the Indiana
6 Rules of Trial Procedure.
7 SECTION 14. IC 31-17-4-8, AS AMENDED BY P.L.68-2005,
8 SECTION 51, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
9 JULY 1, 2022]: Sec. 8. A court that finds an intentional violation
10 without justifiable cause by a custodial parent of an injunction or a
11 temporary restraining order issued under this chapter (or
12 IC 31-1-11.5-26 before its repeal):
13 (1) shall find the custodial parent in contempt of court;
14 (2) shall order the exercise of parenting time that was not
15 exercised due to the violation under this section at a time the
16 court considers compatible with the schedules of the noncustodial
17 parent and the child;
18 (3) may order payment by the custodial parent of reasonable
19 attorney's fees, costs, and expenses to the noncustodial parent;
20 and
21 (4) may order the custodial parent to perform community
22 restitution or service without compensation in a manner specified
23 by the court; and
24 (5) may modify custody of the child under IC 31-17-2-22.
25 SECTION 15. IC 31-17-4-10, AS AMENDED BY P.L.68-2005,
26 SECTION 52, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE
27 JULY 1, 2022]: Sec. 10. A noncustodial parent who misses parenting
28 time as the result of:
29 (1) participation in: an activity of:
30 (1) (A) an activity of the Indiana National Guard; or
31 (2) (B) an activity of a reserve component of the armed forces
32 of the United States;
33 (C) an active deployment in the armed forces of the United
34 States;
35 (D) active service in a state, county, or local law
36 enforcement agency;
37 (E) active service in a fire department; or
38 (F) employment related trips or training; or
39 (2) other factors the court considers to have directly impeded
40 participation of the parent in parenting time with the child;
41 may make up the lost parenting time as provided in IC 10-16-7-22.
2022 IN 1329—LS 7231/DI 119