Indiana Senate Bill SB0125

Indiana 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/4/22
• Refer: 1/4/22
• Report Pass: 1/13/22
• Engrossed: 1/26/22
• Refer: 1/31/22
• Report Pass: 2/10/22
• Enrolled: 2/16/22
• Passed: 3/7/22
• Chaptered: 3/7/22

Caption

Technical corrections.

Impact

The enactment of SB 125 is expected to have several implications for state laws. Specifically, it repeals outdated provisions, such as those related to jury duty. Other sections include legislative refinements concerning voter registration records and candidate filings, thereby enhancing procedural efficiency in the electoral process. Overall, the bill’s adjustments seek to promote clarity and efficiency in Indiana's legal and regulatory environment.

Summary

Senate Bill 125, referred to as the Technical Corrections Bill, serves primarily to amend various provisions within the Indiana Code, addressing numerous housekeeping items and legal clarifications. The primary intent of the bill is to streamline existing statutes and correct technical errors in the law that may have arisen through previous legislative actions. By making these corrections effective July 1, 2022, the bill aims to ensure that the legal framework governing Indiana remains precise and effective for its citizens.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding SB 125 appears to reflect widespread support among legislators, primarily due to its non-controversial nature as a technical corrections measure. Since the bill does not introduce controversial policies but rather seeks to rectify and clarify existing laws, it has garnered a generally positive reception. Legislators view these changes as necessary for maintaining the integrity and functionality of the state’s legal framework.

Contention

While there are few notable points of contention surrounding SB 125, the usual critics of legislative measures might express concerns regarding the speed at which such corrections are made, as well as the potential for unintended consequences from repealing established statutes. Nonetheless, due to the technical nature of the amendments and lack of significant policy shifts, major opposition or substantial debates around the bill’s provisions have not emerged.