Indiana 2024 Regular Session

Indiana House Bill HB1200

Introduced
1/9/24  
Refer
1/9/24  

Caption

State employee health plan payment limits.

Impact

The introduction of HB 1200 proposes to amend existing Indiana healthcare administration laws, dramatically affecting the financial dynamics of medical service reimbursements. By adhering to established Medicare payments as a reference point, the bill aims to control healthcare spending for the state employee health plan. Stakeholders expect that these limitations will ensure more predictable budgeting for state healthcare, while also attempting to expose price discrepancies that often occur in the medical billing process. However, the implications for in-network versus out-of-network providers raised concerns about access to care and potential unintended consequences for medical facilities.

Summary

House Bill 1200 aims to establish payment limits for medical facility services provided to state employees under the state employee health plan. The proposal sets specific caps on reimbursements based on Medicare rates—200% for in-network providers and 185% for out-of-network providers. This legislation outlines a structured approach to determine payment amounts and prohibits additional charges to covered individuals beyond specified cost-sharing arrangements. With an effective date of July 1, 2024, the law seeks to enhance fiscal integrity in the management of state employee healthcare costs.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment towards HB 1200 appears to be mixed. Supporters assert that the bill provides necessary oversight and accountability within state healthcare spending, helping to mitigate unnecessary expenditures and aligning reimbursements more closely with established national standards. Conversely, opponents voice concerns that the payment caps could limit access to care for state employees, particularly if providers decide to stop accepting state employee health plans or if out-of-network providers become less viable due to reduced reimbursements.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the potential impact of strict payment limits on provider behavior and patient access to necessary services. Critics of HB 1200 fear that such restrictions may create barriers to service utilization, particularly for out-of-network care, as patients may find it difficult to receive specialized services that are not adequately covered. The bill's stipulations could lead to healthcare providers facing financial pressures, affecting the quality and availability of services offered under state employee plans.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1732

Redevelopment: successor agencies: asset disposal: City of Manteca.

HI SB716

Relating To Hawaii Employment Security Law.

HI HB477

Relating To The Hawaii Employment Security Law.

CA AB1303

Communications: lifeline telephone service program.

CA SB1024

Replacement of an incapacitated or deceased professional fiduciary.

HI HB467

Relating To Social Work.

HI HB467

Relating To Social Work.

OR HB2020

Relating to qualified nonprofit agencies for individuals with disabilities.