Indiana 2024 Regular Session

Indiana Senate Bill SB0250

Introduced
1/11/24  

Caption

Union County food and beverage tax.

Impact

The food and beverage tax, should it be imposed, can be set at a rate not exceeding 1%, with increments of 0.25%. Revenue from this tax is earmarked specifically for purposes that promote conventions, tourism, and quality of life improvements, which include investments in public spaces, transportation options, and arts and culture. The financial framework established by the bill indicates that the tax will be collected and returned in line with the state gross retail tax procedures, thereby integrating it smoothly into the existing taxation framework.

Summary

Senate Bill 250, titled the Union County Food and Beverage Tax, seeks to authorize Union County to impose a new excise tax on food and beverage transactions occurring within its jurisdiction. The tax is designed to enhance revenue generation for the county, fostering economic development particularly in the areas of tourism and public services. If enacted, the bill allows the county's fiscal body to adopt an ordinance to impose this tax after holding at least one separate public hearing focused solely on the proposed ordinance, ensuring community engagement before implementation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, SB 250 presents a legislative opportunity for Union County to structure a new tax aimed at addressing its specific economic and community needs through increased tourism and civic improvements. The bill reflects a proactive approach by local governance to adapt financial mechanisms in supporting the county's interests. Ultimately, the discussion surrounding its implementation will be pivotal in assessing its expected benefits against potential pushback from stakeholders impacted by the new tax.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 250 may arise from concerns regarding the imposition of an additional tax on residents and businesses, especially in light of existing economic pressures. Critics could argue that the introduction of such a tax may lead to increased costs for consumers and could impact local businesses, potentially dampening the economic activity that the tax aims to enhance. Additionally, there may be debates over the classification of food and beverage services that fall under this tax, as well as the accountability of how the revenue will be utilized by the county.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB618

Transactions and use taxes: City of Scotts Valley: City of Emeryville.

CA AB3259

Transactions and use taxes: City of Campbell: City of Pinole: County of Solano.

CA AB2598

Crimes: money laundering.

CA SB319

Criminal justice statistics: reporting.

CA SB703

Transactions and use taxes: Counties of Alameda and Santa Clara and City of Santa Fe Springs.

CA AB2443

Transactions and use taxes: Cities of Lancaster, Palmdale, and Victorville.

CA SB152

Transactions and use taxes: County of Sonoma.

CA SB335

Transactions and use taxes: County of Santa Clara.