Indiana 2025 Regular Session

Indiana House Bill HB1033

Introduced
1/8/25  
Refer
1/8/25  
Report Pass
1/30/25  
Engrossed
2/7/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Report Pass
3/13/25  
Enrolled
3/19/25  
Passed
4/3/25  
Chaptered
4/3/25  

Caption

Retainage requirements.

Impact

If enacted, HB1033 will significantly impact how public work contracts are managed by state agencies and local governments. The bill aims to mitigate the financial strain often faced by contractors due to high retainage percentages that can linger for extended periods. By legislating communication and transparency in the retainage process, this bill could lead to more efficient project completion and greater financial stability among contractors, particularly those handling smaller contracts.

Summary

House Bill 1033 introduces amendments to the Indiana Code concerning retainage requirements for public work contracts. The bill establishes guidelines for retaining funds from payments to contractors based on the percentage of work completed. For instance, contractors will have a retainage of 10% to 6% withheld until the completion of 50% of public works, and between 5% and 3% until substantial completion. This streamlining is intended to enhance cash flow for contractors by reducing the amount withheld once key project milestones are achieved.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB1033 appears to be positive among construction industry advocates and contractor associations. Many express support for the proposed changes, indicating that these measures could decrease operational hurdles and promote better fiscal health for those engaged in public works. However, there is potential for contention among municipalities and public sector entities concerned about losing leverage in managing contract performance and ensuring completion standards are met.

Contention

Notably, the bill has sparked discussions regarding the balance of power between contractors and local governmental bodies. Critics worry that lowering retainage might lead to less oversight and could embolden contractors to leave minor tasks unfinished since less cash will be withheld. The conversation centers on finding the right amount of retainage that incentivizes contract completion while also ensuring that there are adequate protections for local authorities against project delays or deficiencies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB334

Public contracts: conflicts of interest.

VA HB2500

Construction contracts; payment clauses to be included in certain contracts.

CA AB971

Public contracts: information technology services: contractor evaluations.

CA AB1546

Public contracts: information technology: contractor performance assessment report.

CA SB1192

Public contracts: withheld payments.

OR HB4006

Relating to submitting surety bonds in lieu of retainage; declaring an emergency.

OR SB722

Relating to retainage in construction contracts; prescribing an effective date.

MI HB5976

State management: purchasing; awarding contracts to entities that donate or contribute to certain political candidates or committees; prohibit. Amends 1984 PA 431 (MCL 18.1101 - 18.1594) by adding sec. 264b.