Indiana 2025 Regular Session

Indiana House Bill HB1067

Introduced
1/8/25  

Caption

Joint custody.

Impact

The bill also introduces a rebuttable presumption in favor of equal division of parenting time, which means that unless proven detrimental to the child, time spent with each parent should generally be balanced. By doing so, HB 1067 aims to reduce conflicts that often arise in custody arrangements and encourage cooperation between parents. This legal framework is expected to streamline custody decisions and foster collaborative parenting, thereby benefiting children's emotional and developmental needs.

Summary

House Bill 1067 amends existing Indiana family law regarding joint custody arrangements between biological parents. The bill establishes that both the biological mother and father will have joint legal custody of their children unless a court determines otherwise in the child's best interests. This aligns with a growing trend to promote shared parenting responsibilities and acknowledges the essential roles both parents play in a child's upbringing. Effective from July 1, 2025, the legislation seeks to create an equitable standard of parental involvement post-separation or divorce.

Conclusion

In summary, HB 1067 is a significant step towards modernizing Indiana's family law framework by promoting joint legal custody and equitable parenting time. Its potential benefits for children's welfare must be weighed against the complexities it may introduce into custody litigation, necessitating careful judicial consideration to ensure that child welfare remains at the forefront of custody determinations.

Contention

However, the bill may also face scrutiny regarding its implications for the definition of 'best interests of the child' on a case-by-case basis. While many stakeholders support promoting joint custody, concerns have been raised about the practicality of equal parenting time in cases involving family violence or situations where one parent may not contribute positively to the child's welfare. The measure's reliance on a rebuttable presumption could lead to further legal challenges as parents navigate custody disputes, potentially complicating the family law landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX SB738

Relating to the transfer or termination of certain timeshare interests.

TX HB2261

Relating to the transfer or termination of certain timeshare interests.

CA SB401

Political Reform Act of 1974: state employees: financial interests.

VA HB2292

Common interest communities; termination of certain management contracts.

VA HB2750

Common interest communities; termination of certain management contracts.

CA AB1398

Workers’ compensation.

CA AB1029

Statements of financial interest: digital financial assets.

MS SB2843

State Treasury Efficiency Act; enact.