23 | 18 | | First Regular Session of the 124th General Assembly (2025) |
---|
24 | 19 | | HOUSE CONCURRENT |
---|
25 | 20 | | RESOLUTION No. 3 |
---|
26 | 21 | | 1 A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION urging regional |
---|
27 | 22 | | 2 transmission organizations, the Federal Energy Regulatory |
---|
28 | 23 | | 3 Commission, the United States Department of Energy, the |
---|
29 | 24 | | 4 North American Electric Reliability Corporation, and the |
---|
30 | 25 | | 5 United States Congress to take such actions as necessary to |
---|
31 | 26 | | 6 enact reform processes to expedite the approval of electric |
---|
32 | 27 | | 7 transmission and generation projects. |
---|
33 | 28 | | 8 Whereas, The Indiana General Assembly has established |
---|
34 | 29 | | 9 energy policy based on balancing the "Five Pillars" |
---|
35 | 30 | | 10 instrumental to the state's long term energy goals: reliability, |
---|
36 | 31 | | 11 affordability, resiliency, stability, and environmental |
---|
37 | 32 | | 12 sustainability; |
---|
38 | 33 | | 13 Whereas, Energy demand is accelerating across Indiana and |
---|
39 | 34 | | 14 the Midwest because of growth in data centers, advanced |
---|
40 | 35 | | 15 manufacturing, and other economic development projects; |
---|
41 | 36 | | 16 Whereas, Indiana's regulatory framework has established the |
---|
42 | 37 | | 17 Hoosier State as a highly desirable location for economic |
---|
43 | 38 | | 18 development projects; |
---|
44 | 39 | | 19 Whereas, The ability to quickly develop and build additive |
---|
45 | 40 | | 20 energy infrastructure, including generation and transmission, |
---|
46 | 41 | | 21 is critical to the economic development and electric resource |
---|
47 | 42 | | 22 adequacy of Indiana and the Midwest; |
---|
48 | 43 | | 23 Whereas, Regional transmission organizations' current |
---|
49 | 44 | | 24 generator interconnection review processes are overwhelmed |
---|
50 | 45 | | 25 with requests for new resource interconnections, such that the |
---|
51 | 46 | | 26 current process has become unworkable, and a process initially |
---|
52 | 47 | | HC 3—HC 1004/DI 140 2 |
---|
53 | 48 | | 1 designed to take months to complete now takes many years to |
---|
54 | 49 | | 2 complete before incremental transmission infrastructure and |
---|
55 | 50 | | 3 generation can be added to the grid; |
---|
56 | 51 | | 4 Whereas, Regional transmission organizations play a critical |
---|
57 | 52 | | 5 role in analyzing the addition of transmission infrastructure |
---|
58 | 53 | | 6 and dispatchable generation for large load demand additions; |
---|
59 | 54 | | 7 Whereas, The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission has |
---|
60 | 55 | | 8 long had regulatory responsibility for assuring generation |
---|
61 | 56 | | 9 resource adequacy for retail electric customers; |
---|
62 | 57 | | 10 Whereas, The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has |
---|
63 | 58 | | 11 authority to amend regulations and approve tariff changes to |
---|
64 | 59 | | 12 grant regional transmission organizations the flexibility to |
---|
65 | 60 | | 13 adjust interconnection queue priorities based on resource |
---|
66 | 61 | | 14 reliability attributes, grid reliability, and resilience needs; and |
---|
67 | 62 | | 15 Whereas, Indiana's load serving entities, consisting of those |
---|
68 | 63 | | 16 electric utilities with a statutory obligation to serve their |
---|
69 | 64 | | 17 jurisdictional customers and plan for future load growth |
---|
70 | 65 | | 18 through an integrated resource planning process, and the |
---|
71 | 66 | | 19 Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission are best positioned to |
---|
72 | 67 | | 20 understand and respond to the needs of the electric system and |
---|
73 | 68 | | 21 large load additions to the system: Therefore, |
---|
74 | 69 | | 22 Be it resolved by the House of Representatives |
---|
75 | 70 | | 23 of the General Assembly of the State of Indiana, |
---|
76 | 71 | | 24 the Senate concurring: |
---|
77 | 72 | | 25 SECTION 1. That the Indiana General Assembly urges the |
---|
78 | 73 | | 26 regional transmission organizations that operate facilities in |
---|
79 | 74 | | 27 Indiana to take the necessary steps to prioritize transmission and |
---|
80 | 75 | | 28 generation additions proposed by Indiana's load serving entities |
---|
81 | 76 | | 29 and specifically determined by the Indiana Utility Regulatory |
---|
82 | 77 | | 30 Commission as necessary for resource adequacy. |
---|
83 | 78 | | 31 SECTION 2. That the Indiana General Assembly determines |
---|
84 | 79 | | 32 that solutions must include the establishment of an expedited |
---|
85 | 80 | | 33 interconnection review process for Indiana's load serving |
---|
86 | 81 | | 34 entities consistent with their integrated resource plans. |
---|
87 | 82 | | 35 SECTION 3. That the Indiana General Assembly determines |
---|
88 | 83 | | 36 that solutions must also include an expedited interconnection |
---|
89 | 84 | | 37 review process for dispatchable resources that is critical to |
---|
90 | 85 | | 38 serving growing load requirements around the clock and that is |
---|
91 | 86 | | HC 3—HC 1004/DI 140 3 |
---|
92 | 87 | | 1 consistent with the Five Pillars of Indiana's energy policy. |
---|
93 | 88 | | 2 SECTION 4. That the Indiana General Assembly determines |
---|
94 | 89 | | 3 that solutions must also include an expedited interconnection |
---|
95 | 90 | | 4 review process for incremental generation added at existing |
---|
96 | 91 | | 5 generation stations where an electric utility plans to use a |
---|
97 | 92 | | 6 generator replacement review process. |
---|
98 | 93 | | 7 SECTION 5. That the Indiana General Assembly urges |
---|
99 | 94 | | 8 regional transmission organizations, the Federal Energy |
---|
100 | 95 | | 9 Regulatory Commission, the United States Department of |
---|
101 | 96 | | 10 Energy, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, |
---|
102 | 97 | | 11 and the United States Congress to take such actions as are |
---|
103 | 98 | | 12 necessary to enact reform processes to expedite the approval of |
---|
104 | 99 | | 13 electric transmission and generation projects to promote |
---|
105 | 100 | | 14 Indiana's economic development through the approval and |
---|
106 | 101 | | 15 implementation of these solutions. |
---|
107 | 102 | | 16 SECTION 6. That the Principal Clerk of the House of |
---|
108 | 103 | | 17 Representatives shall transmit a copy of this resolution to the |
---|
109 | 104 | | 18 presiding officers of the Senate and the House of |
---|
110 | 105 | | 19 Representatives of the United States Congress, each member of |
---|
111 | 106 | | 20 the Indiana Congressional delegation, the Federal Energy |
---|
112 | 107 | | 21 Regulatory Commission, the United States Department of |
---|
113 | 108 | | 22 Energy, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, |
---|
114 | 109 | | 23 the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, and the PJM |
---|
115 | 110 | | 24 Interconnection. |
---|
116 | 111 | | HC 3—HC 1004/DI 140 4 |
---|
117 | 112 | | COMMITTEE REPORT |
---|
118 | 113 | | Mr. Speaker: Your Committee on Utilities, Energy and |
---|
119 | 114 | | Telecommunications, to which was referred House Concurrent |
---|
120 | 115 | | Resolution 3, has had the same under consideration and begs leave to |
---|
121 | 116 | | report the same back to the House with the recommendation that said |
---|
122 | 117 | | resolution do pass. |
---|
123 | 118 | | (Reference is to HC 3 as printed January 8, 2025.) |
---|
124 | 119 | | SOLIDAY |
---|
125 | 120 | | Committee Vote: Yeas 9, Nays 2 |
---|