Indiana 2025 Regular Session

Indiana Senate Bill SB0142

Introduced
1/8/25  
Refer
1/8/25  
Report Pass
1/16/25  
Engrossed
1/29/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
3/31/25  
Enrolled
4/9/25  
Passed
5/1/25  
Chaptered
5/1/25  

Caption

Eviction issues.

Impact

The bill will significantly affect the handling of eviction records by requiring courts to seal documents under designated situations, thereby offering a degree of protection for tenants against the long-term repercussions of eviction filings. By potentially limiting access to eviction records, the legislation seeks to diminish the negative impacts that past evictions can have on tenants' future housing opportunities, thus promoting broader housing stability across the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 142 addresses eviction processes in Indiana, specifically focusing on confidentiality for certain eviction records. The bill stipulates that tenants have the right to petition courts to prohibit the disclosure of records associated with eviction actions under specific circumstances, such as when a case is dismissed, results in a judgment in favor of the tenant, or when a judgment against a tenant has been overturned. This measure aims to enhance tenant privacy and prevent potential discrimination that could arise from public access to eviction records.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 142 appears to be largely supportive among tenant advocacy groups, who argue it is a necessary step towards protecting vulnerable renters from the stigma of eviction records. However, there are concerns from landlords and some legal experts about the implications of sealing public records, including fears that it could obscure essential information and complicate the rental market dynamics. The discourse reflects a balancing act between tenant protection and the transparency of housing processes.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates over the effectiveness of sealing eviction records in actually helping tenants and whether it undermines the rights of landlords who seek to make informed decisions about rental agreements. Some stakeholders argue that while the bill addresses crucial tenant rights issues, it may unintentionally create challenges for landlords and property managers by restricting access to relevant eviction history, thereby complicating their ability to evaluate potential tenants.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1200

Enforcement of judgments: renewal and interest.

AZ HB2297

Judgments; liens; homestead exemption

KY HB801

AN ACT relating to Canadian money judgments.

CA AB1119

Enforcement of judgments.

CA AB905

Money judgments of other jurisdictions.

CA SB642

Civil actions: renewal of judgments.

VA HB1234

Judgments; limitations on enforcement, extensions and renewals.

CA SB355

Judgment debtor employers: Employment Development Department.