Indiana 2025 Regular Session

Indiana Senate Bill SB0482

Introduced
1/13/25  
Refer
1/13/25  
Report Pass
1/30/25  
Engrossed
2/5/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  

Caption

Absenteeism and student discipline.

Impact

This legislation will significantly affect state laws related to school attendance and student discipline. Notably, it prohibits schools from expelling or suspending students solely due to chronic absenteeism or habitual truancy. This aims to create a more supportive environment for students facing challenges that lead to absenteeism, as it emphasizes intervention and support services over punitive actions. The bill not only encourages collaboration among schools, parents, and service providers but also lays a framework that enables schools to develop and implement comprehensive absenteeism reduction plans as part of their improvement strategies.

Summary

Senate Bill 482, also known as the Absenteeism and Student Discipline Bill, seeks to address issues surrounding school absenteeism and disciplinary measures related to students deemed chronically absent. The bill defines 'chronically absent' as missing ten percent or more of a school year for any reason. It mandates the Department of Education to prioritize the reduction of absenteeism and to assist schools in identifying contributing factors while developing strategies to tackle chronic absenteeism effectively. Additionally, it requires the establishment of a categorization framework for excused absences based on the reason for the absence.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 482 appears to be largely supportive, as it reflects a growing consensus among educators and policymakers that punitive measures are inadequate for addressing the root causes of absenteeism. Advocates express optimism that this bill will help foster a more inclusive and understanding approach toward students struggling with attendance. However, there may be concerns among stakeholders regarding the implications of reduced disciplinary measures and whether they might inadvertently compromise educational standards or accountability.

Contention

While overall reception has been favorable, some contention exists regarding the level of flexibility given to schools in determining attendance policies. Critics argue that without stringent measures to hold students accountable, chronic absenteeism may become a persistent issue. Moreover, there is concern about how the categorization framework will be implemented and accepted by different school districts, particularly in managing the balance between supporting students and maintaining academic standards.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

IN HB1217

Prosecuting attorneys.

IN HB1006

Prosecutors.

TX HB200

Relating to the reestablishment of the Prosecuting Attorneys Coordinating Council.

TX HB1732

Relating to the reestablishment of the Prosecuting Attorneys Coordinating Council.

TX SB404

Relating to the reestablishment of the Prosecuting Attorneys Coordinating Council.

MS SB2329

Giglio letter; require prosecutors to give law enforcement officers an opportunity to be heard before sending.

MS HB101

Giglio letter; require prosecutors to give law enforcement officers an opportunity to be heard before sending.

TX HB12

Relating to the border prosecution unit.